Lee Shuying, Lew Eileen, Lim Yvonne, Sia Alex T
Department of Women's Anesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
Anesth Analg. 2009 Jan;108(1):252-4. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181900260.
In this study, we aimed to identify the incidence and predictive factors associated with failed labor epidural augmentation for cesarean delivery. Data of parturients, who had received neuraxial labor analgesia and who subsequently required intrapartum cesarean delivery during an 18-mo period, were retrospectively studied. Predictors associated with failure of extension of epidural analgesia in the presence of adequate time for onset of epidural anesthesia were identified by univariate logistic regression. Of the 1025 parturients, 1.7% had failed epidural extension. Predictors of failed epidural anesthesia included initiation of labor analgesia with plain epidural technique (compared to combined spinal-epidural) (P = 0.001), >or=2 episodes of breakthrough pain during labor (P < 0.001) and prolonged duration of neuraxial labor analgesia (P = 0.02).
在本研究中,我们旨在确定剖宫产分娩时硬膜外分娩镇痛加强失败的发生率及相关预测因素。对在18个月期间接受了椎管内分娩镇痛且随后需要在产时进行剖宫产的产妇数据进行了回顾性研究。通过单因素逻辑回归确定了在硬膜外麻醉起效时间充足的情况下与硬膜外镇痛延长失败相关的预测因素。在1025名产妇中,1.7%的产妇硬膜外延长失败。硬膜外麻醉失败的预测因素包括采用单纯硬膜外技术开始分娩镇痛(与腰麻-硬膜外联合阻滞相比)(P = 0.001)、产程中≥2次突破性疼痛发作(P < 0.001)以及椎管内分娩镇痛持续时间延长(P = 0.02)。