Libby Peter
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Lipid Res. 2009 Apr;50 Suppl(Suppl):S352-7. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R800099-JLR200. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
Clinicians have traditionally regarded the complications of atherosclerosis as a consequence of progressive arterial stenosis leading to critical narrowings that impede blood flow. Our contemporary understanding of the thrombotic complications of atherosclerosis has undergone a transformation based on a body of observations by pathologists and clinicians. In the late 1980s, clinicians had to confront the counterintuitive notion that plaques that cause acute myocardial infarction often do not produce high-grade stenoses (Smith, S. C., Jr. 1996. Risk-reduction therapy: the challenge to change. Circulation. 93: 2205-2211.). Observations from serial angiographic studies and on culprit lesions of acute myocardial infarction postthrombolysis highlighted this apparent paradox. These contrarian clinical findings prompted cardiologists to consider more carefully the findings of generations of pathologists that plaques that cause fatal coronary thrombi often result from a physical disruption of the atheromatous plaque that may not indeed cause critical arterial narrowing. This convergence of clinical and pathological observations highlighted the importance of understanding the mechanisms of disruption of plaques that can precipitate thromboses.
传统上,临床医生认为动脉粥样硬化的并发症是动脉逐渐狭窄导致严重狭窄从而阻碍血流的结果。基于病理学家和临床医生的一系列观察,我们对动脉粥样硬化血栓形成并发症的当代理解已经发生了转变。在20世纪80年代后期,临床医生不得不面对一个与直觉相悖的观念,即导致急性心肌梗死的斑块通常不会产生高度狭窄(史密斯,S.C.,Jr. 1996年。风险降低治疗:变革的挑战。《循环》。93: 2205 - 2211)。系列血管造影研究以及急性心肌梗死后溶栓治疗罪犯病变的观察结果突出了这一明显的矛盾。这些与传统观念相悖的临床发现促使心脏病学家更仔细地考虑几代病理学家的发现,即导致致命冠状动脉血栓形成的斑块通常是由动脉粥样硬化斑块的物理破坏引起的,而这种破坏实际上可能不会导致严重的动脉狭窄。临床和病理观察结果的这种趋同突出了理解能够引发血栓形成的斑块破裂机制的重要性。