Boyer Ana Lledó, Mira Pastor Maria Angeles, Calatayud Nieves Pons, Lopez-Roig Sofía, Cantero Terol Maria Carmen
Departamento de Psicología de la Salud, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Campus de San Juan, Crta. N-332, 03550, San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
Rheumatol Int. 2009 Aug;29(10):1151-60. doi: 10.1007/s00296-008-0818-y. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
The aim of this study was to compare clinical symptoms, perceived health status, health resource use and psychosocial features in fibromyalgia (FM) patients at different health care levels. A total of 315 participants were recruited from primary care (PC) (n=101) and rheumatology settings (RS) (n=214). Subjects completed a protocol of clinical features and health resource use, hospital anxiety and depression scale, sickness impact profile, chronic pain self-efficacy scale, multidimensional pain locus of control scale, perceived health competence scale and chronic pain coping inventory. Student's t test, effect size, and contrast and power test were performed to examine differences between samples. FM patients treated in PC and RS were similar in most variables assessed and only differed significantly in tender points, sleep disturbance, wellness-focused coping strategies and in self-efficacy beliefs. The similarities do not support patient selection through care levels and thus, in the Spanish health care system at least, endorse PC as a reference unit for treatment and questioning the benefits of referring patients to RS.
本研究旨在比较不同医疗保健水平下纤维肌痛(FM)患者的临床症状、感知健康状况、卫生资源利用及心理社会特征。共从初级保健(PC)机构招募了101名参与者,从风湿病专科(RS)机构招募了214名参与者。受试者完成了一份关于临床特征和卫生资源利用的问卷、医院焦虑抑郁量表、疾病影响概况、慢性疼痛自我效能量表、多维疼痛控制源量表、感知健康能力量表及慢性疼痛应对量表。采用学生t检验、效应量、对比及效能检验来检测样本间的差异。在大多数评估变量中,PC机构和RS机构治疗的FM患者相似,仅在压痛点、睡眠障碍、以健康为重点的应对策略及自我效能信念方面存在显著差异。这些相似性不支持根据医疗保健水平来选择患者,因此,至少在西班牙医疗保健系统中,认可PC机构作为治疗的参考单位,并质疑将患者转诊至RS机构的益处。