Gissler Mika, Alexander Sophie, MacFarlane Alison, Small Rhonda, Stray-Pedersen Babill, Zeitlin Jennifer, Zimbeck Megan, Gagnon Anita
STAKES National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(2):134-48. doi: 10.1080/00016340802603805.
The relation of migration to infant outcomes is unclear. There are studies which show that some migrant groups have similar or even better outcomes than those from the receiving country. Equally, raised risk of adverse outcomes for other migrant groups has been reported.
We sought to determine (1) if migrants in western industrialized countries have consistently higher risks of stillbirth, neonatal mortality, or infant mortality, (2) if there are migrant sub-groups at potentially higher risk, and (3) what might be the explanations for any risk differences found.
Systematic review of the literature on perinatal health outcomes among migrants in western industrialized countries.
Drawing on a larger systematic review of perinatal outcomes and migration, we reviewed studies including mortality outcomes (stillbirths and infant deaths).
Eligible studies gave conflicting results. Half (53%) reported worse mortality outcomes, one third (35%) reported no differences and a few (13%) reported better outcomes for births to migrants compared to the receiving country population. Refugees were the most vulnerable group. For non-refugees, non-European migrants in Europe and foreign-born blacks in the United States had the highest excess mortality. In general, adjustment of background factors did not explain the increased mortality rate among migrants. Regarding causes of death, higher preterm birth rates explained the increased mortality figures among some migrant groups. The increased mortality from congenital anomalies may be related to restricted access to screening, but also to differing attitudes to screening and termination of pregnancy.
Mortality risk among babies born to migrants is not consistently higher, but appears to be greatest among refugees, non-European migrants to Europe, and foreign-born blacks in the US. To understand this variation better, more information is needed about migrant background, such as length of time in receiving country and receiving country language fluency. Additional data on demographic, health care, biological, medical, and socioeconomic risk factors should be gathered and analyzed in greater detail.
移民与婴儿健康结局之间的关系尚不清楚。一些研究表明,某些移民群体的健康结局与接收国的群体相似,甚至更好。同样,也有报告称其他移民群体出现不良结局的风险增加。
我们试图确定:(1)西方工业化国家的移民死产、新生儿死亡或婴儿死亡风险是否始终较高;(2)是否存在潜在风险较高的移民亚群体;(3)对于所发现的任何风险差异可能的解释是什么。
对西方工业化国家移民围产期健康结局的文献进行系统综述。
基于对围产期结局与移民的更大规模系统综述,我们回顾了包括死亡结局(死产和婴儿死亡)的研究。
符合条件的研究结果相互矛盾。一半(53%)的研究报告移民的死亡结局更差,三分之一(35%)的研究报告无差异,少数(13%)的研究报告移民出生的结局优于接收国人口。难民是最脆弱的群体。对于非难民,欧洲的非欧洲移民和美国出生的黑人超额死亡率最高。一般来说,背景因素的调整并不能解释移民中死亡率上升的情况。关于死亡原因,较高的早产率解释了一些移民群体死亡率上升的情况。先天性异常导致的死亡率上升可能与筛查机会有限有关,但也与对筛查和终止妊娠的不同态度有关。
移民所生孩子的死亡风险并非始终较高,但在难民、欧洲的非欧洲移民和美国出生的黑人中似乎最高。为了更好地理解这种差异,需要更多关于移民背景的信息,例如在接收国的居住时间和接收国语言流利程度。应收集并更详细地分析关于人口统计学、医疗保健、生物学、医学和社会经济风险因素的更多数据。