Reid D H, Parsons M B, Green C W, Schepis M M
Western Carolina Center, Morganton, North Carolina 28655.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Summer;24(2):293-304. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-293.
We evaluated the proficiency of the federal Medicaid program's survey process for evaluating intermediate care facilities for the mentally retarded. In Study 1, an observational analysis of active treatment during leisure times in living units suggested that these surveys did not discriminate between certified and noncertified units. In Study 2, a reactivity analysis of a survey indicated that direct-care staff performed differently during the survey by increasing interactions with clients and decreasing nonwork behavior. Similarly, results of Study 3 showed increases in client access to leisure materials during a survey. In Study 4, questionnaire results indicated considerable variability among service providers' opinions on the consistency, accuracy, and objectivity with which survey teams determine agency standard compliance. Results are discussed regarding effects of the questionable proficiency of survey processes and the potential utility of behavioral assessment methodologies to improve such processes.
我们评估了联邦医疗补助计划用于评估智障中级护理设施的调查流程的熟练度。在研究1中,对居住单元休闲时间的积极治疗进行的观察性分析表明,这些调查无法区分已认证和未认证的单元。在研究2中,一项调查的反应性分析表明,直接护理人员在调查期间的行为有所不同,他们增加了与客户的互动并减少了非工作行为。同样,研究3的结果表明,在调查期间客户获取休闲材料的机会有所增加。在研究4中,问卷调查结果表明,服务提供者对调查团队确定机构标准合规性的一致性、准确性和客观性的看法存在很大差异。讨论了有关调查流程熟练度存疑的影响以及行为评估方法在改进此类流程方面的潜在效用的结果。