Erlich H A
Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991 Sep;5(3):395-411. doi: 10.1016/s0950-351x(05)80138-7.
The analysis of HLA class II sequence variation in IDDM patients and controls, made possible by the PCR, has revealed that specific alleles are associated with IDDM. The HLA-DQ beta chain appears to play a role in determining genetic susceptibility and resistance, although polymorphisms in the DRB1, the DQ alpha, and the DP beta chain may also contribute. Although there is a correlation between susceptibility and the charge of DQ beta residue 57, the complex genetic epidemiology of IDDM cannot be accounted for by polymorphism at this position. As we have discussed previously (Horn et al, 1988a, 1988b; Erlich et al, 1990b), there are no unique class II sequences associated with IDDM, consistent with the view that 'normal' class II alleles confer susceptibility. Given the estimates of concordance of under 50% for monozygotic twins and approximately 15% (Tattersall and Pyke, 1972; Thomson, 1988) for HLA-identical sibs--it is not surprising that some unaffected individuals contain putative susceptibility alleles. Perhaps some environmental 'triggering' agent, such as viral infection, is required for the disease to develop in susceptible individuals. Other non-MHC-linked genes which contribute to susceptibility may account for the difference in concordance rates for monozygotic twins and for HLA-identical sibs. In the NOD (non-obese diabetic) mouse and the BB rat models for IDDM, non-MHC susceptibility loci have been identified and mapped (Colle et al, 1981; Hattori et al, 1986) but, in humans, the analysis of non-MHC candidate loci (i.e. the T cell receptor) has, thus far, failed to reveal any other susceptibility loci. In general, the HLA-linked genetic susceptibility to IDDM, as well as to other autoimmune diseases, appears to be associated with specific combinations of class II epitopes (e.g. alleles, haplotypes or genotypes) rather than with specific individual residues or epitopes. Understanding the role of these predisposing sequences will require structural analysis of the class II molecules as well as in vitro and in vivo functional studies of interactions with putative autoantigens and T cell receptors. In the meantime, DNA typing offers the potential for identifying individuals at high risk. These susceptible individuals could be monitored by immunological (e.g. anti-islet cell antibody) or by metabolic tests to detect the preclinical phase of IDDM.
聚合酶链反应(PCR)使得对胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)患者及对照者的HLA - II类序列变异进行分析成为可能,结果显示特定等位基因与IDDM相关。HLA - DQβ链似乎在决定遗传易感性和抗性方面发挥作用,尽管DRB1、DQα和DPβ链中的多态性也可能有影响。虽然易感性与DQβ第57位残基的电荷之间存在相关性,但IDDM复杂的遗传流行病学不能仅由该位置的多态性来解释。正如我们之前所讨论的(霍恩等人,1988a,1988b;埃尔利希等人,1990b),不存在与IDDM相关的独特II类序列,这与“正常”II类等位基因赋予易感性的观点一致。鉴于同卵双胞胎的一致性估计低于50%,HLA相同的同胞的一致性约为15%(塔特索尔和派克,1972;汤姆森,1988),一些未受影响的个体含有推定的易感等位基因也就不足为奇了。也许疾病在易感个体中发展需要某种环境“触发”因素,如病毒感染。其他与易感性相关的非MHC连锁基因可能解释了同卵双胞胎和HLA相同的同胞在一致性率上的差异。在IDDM的非肥胖糖尿病(NOD)小鼠和BB大鼠模型中,已鉴定并定位了非MHC易感基因座(科勒等人,1981;服部等人,1986),但在人类中,对非MHC候选基因座(即T细胞受体)的分析迄今为止未能揭示任何其他易感基因座。一般来说,HLA连锁的对IDDM以及其他自身免疫性疾病的遗传易感性似乎与II类表位的特定组合(如等位基因、单倍型或基因型)相关,而不是与特定的单个残基或表位相关。了解这些易感序列的作用需要对II类分子进行结构分析以及对与推定自身抗原和T细胞受体相互作用的体外和体内功能研究。同时,DNA分型为识别高危个体提供了可能性。这些易感个体可以通过免疫学(如抗胰岛细胞抗体)或代谢测试进行监测,以检测IDDM的临床前期。