• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用求爱请求的登门坎技巧:一项实地实验。

Foot-in-the-door technique using a courtship request: a field experiment.

作者信息

Guéguen Nicolas, Marchand Marie, Pascual Alexandre, Lourel Marcel

机构信息

Université de Bretagne-Sud, UFR LSHS, Lorient, France.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2008 Oct;103(2):529-34. doi: 10.2466/pr0.103.2.529-534.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.103.2.529-534
PMID:19102478
Abstract

"Foot-in-the-door" is a well-known compliance technique which increases compliance to a request. Many investigations with this paradigm have generally used prosocial requests to test its effect. Evaluation of the effect of foot-in-the-door was carried out with a courtship request. 360 young women were solicited in the street to accept having a drink with a young male confederate. In the foot-in-the-door condition, before being solicited to have a drink, the young woman was asked to give directions to the confederate or to give him a light for his cigarette. Analysis showed foot-in-the-door was associated with greater compliance to the second request. The theoretical implication of such results with this nonprosocial request are discussed.

摘要

“得寸进尺”是一种广为人知的依从技巧,它能提高对请求的依从性。许多采用这种范式的研究通常使用亲社会请求来测试其效果。本研究通过一个求爱请求来评估“得寸进尺”效应。研究人员在街上邀请360名年轻女性与一名年轻男性同伙喝一杯。在“得寸进尺”条件下,在邀请年轻女性喝一杯之前,先让她给同伙指路或为他点烟。分析表明,“得寸进尺”效应与对第二个请求更高的依从性相关。本文讨论了这些关于非亲社会请求结果的理论意义。

相似文献

1
Foot-in-the-door technique using a courtship request: a field experiment.运用求爱请求的登门坎技巧:一项实地实验。
Psychol Rep. 2008 Oct;103(2):529-34. doi: 10.2466/pr0.103.2.529-534.
2
Compliments and receptivity to a courtship request: a field experiment.
Psychol Rep. 2013 Feb;112(1):239-42. doi: 10.2466/28.07.21.PR0.112.1.239-242.
3
The effect of the two feet-in-the-door technique on tobacco deprivation.双脚进门槛技巧对戒烟的影响。
Psychol Health. 2016 Jun;31(6):768-75. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2016.1154146. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
4
Door-in-the-face technique and monetary solicitation: an evaluation in a field setting.留面子效应与金钱募捐:一项实地环境中的评估
Percept Mot Skills. 2006 Dec;103(3):974-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.103.3.974-978.
5
Low-ball and compliance to a request: an application in a field setting.
Psychol Rep. 2002 Aug;91(1):81-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.91.1.81.
6
THE EFFECT OF THE "EVOKING FREEDOM" TECHNIQUE ON AN UNUSUAL AND DISTURBING REQUEST.“唤起自由”技巧对一个异常且令人不安的请求的影响。
Psychol Rep. 2015 Jun;116(3):936-40. doi: 10.2466/21.PR0.116k31w1. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
7
Effects of solicitor sex and attractiveness on receptivity to sexual offers: a field study.律师性别和吸引力对接受性提议的影响:一项现场研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Oct;40(5):915-9. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9750-4. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
8
Door-in-the-face technique and delay to fulfill the final request: an evaluation with a request to give blood.登门槛技术和延迟满足最终请求:以献血请求为例的评估。
J Psychol. 2014 Sep-Oct;148(5):569-76. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2013.817963.
9
Mindfulness and Compliance: The Way We Make Requests Influences Compliance With the Foot-in-the-Door Strategy.正念与依从性:我们提出请求的方式会影响对登门槛策略的依从性。
Psychol Rep. 2018 Dec;121(6):1147-1166. doi: 10.1177/0033294117745885. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
10
Fund-raising on the web: the effect of an electronic door-in-the-face technique on compliance to a request.网络募捐:电子“以退为进”技巧对请求依从性的影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003 Apr;6(2):189-93. doi: 10.1089/109493103321640383.

引用本文的文献

1
Scientific Research Conformity of University Teachers: Role of Incentives and Internal Attribution.高校教师科研行为的一致性:激励与内部归因的作用
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 27;12(10):1302. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12101302.
2
Does SMS-Support Make a Difference? Effectiveness of a Two-Week Online-Training to Overcome Procrastination. A Randomized Controlled Trial.短信支持有作用吗?一项为期两周的克服拖延症在线培训的有效性。一项随机对照试验。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 5;9:1103. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01103. eCollection 2018.