Spencker Sebastian, Coban Nalan, Koch Lydia, Schirdewan Alexander, Müller Dirk
Division of Cardiology, Charité-Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200 Berlin, Germany.
Europace. 2009 Apr;11(4):483-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun350. Epub 2008 Dec 22.
Lead dysfunctions in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients can lead to inappropriate shocks or even complete loss of function of the device. Home monitoring (HM) systems are capable of daily data transmissions regarding the device and the lead integrity as well as information concerning anti-arrhythmic therapies. We therefore analysed the data from the Biotronik HM system whether it enables physicians to react quickly on serious ICD malfunctions and to avoid inappropriate shocks.
Fifty-four patients who had to undergo resurgery due to malfunctions of the ICD lead were included. Eleven of them were on HM interrogating the device every night at 3 am. If any adverse event was detected, a fax alert was sent to the clinic and the patients were asked for in-hospital ICD interrogation. The rate of inappropriate shocks and symptomatic pacemaker inhibition due to oversensing was compared with the 43 patients without remote surveillance. HM sent alert messages in 91% of all incidents. All lead failures became obvious because of oversensing of high frequency artefacts. Only in 18%, changes in the pacing impedance were noticed, in all cases preceded by oversensing. Eighty per cent of the patients were asymptomatic at the first onset of oversensing. Only one patient suffered an inappropriate shock as first manifestation of lead failure. Compared with the patients without HM, inappropriate shocks occurred in 27.3% in the HM group vs. 46.5% (P = n.s.). This trend gains statistical significance, if the compound endpoint of symptomatic lead failure consisting of inappropriate shocks and symptomatic pacemaker inhibition due to oversensing is focused: 27.3% event in the HM group vs. 53.4% in the group without HM (P = 0.04). Event messages were despatched in a mean of 54 days after the last ICD interrogation and 56 days before next scheduled visit. Thus, 56 days of reaction time are gained to avoid adverse events.
In 91% of all lead-related ICD complications, the diagnosis could be established correctly by an alert of the HM system. Mostly, the first incident sent was oversensing of artefacts, falsely detected as ventricular fibrillation-the VF zone. The automatic HM surveillance system enables physicians to detect severe lead problems early and to react quickly; thus, it might have a potential to avoid inappropriate shocks due to lead failure and T-wave oversensing.
植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者的导线功能障碍可导致不适当电击,甚至设备完全丧失功能。家庭监测(HM)系统能够每日传输有关设备和导线完整性的数据以及抗心律失常治疗的信息。因此,我们分析了百多力HM系统的数据,以确定它是否能使医生对严重的ICD故障迅速做出反应并避免不适当电击。
纳入54例因ICD导线故障而必须再次手术的患者。其中11例使用HM,每天凌晨3点对设备进行询问。如果检测到任何不良事件,会向诊所发送传真警报,并要求患者进行住院ICD询问。将因感知过度导致的不适当电击和有症状的起搏器抑制发生率与43例未进行远程监测的患者进行比较。HM在所有事件的91%中发送了警报信息。所有导线故障均因高频伪迹感知过度而变得明显。仅18%的病例注意到起搏阻抗变化,所有病例均先有感知过度。80%的患者在首次感知过度发作时无症状。仅1例患者在导线故障的首发表现为不适当电击。与未使用HM的患者相比,HM组不适当电击发生率为27.3%,未使用HM组为46.5%(P=无统计学意义)。如果关注由不适当电击和因感知过度导致的有症状起搏器抑制组成的有症状导线故障复合终点,则这一趋势具有统计学意义:HM组事件发生率为27.3%,未使用HM组为53.4%(P=0.04)。事件信息在最后一次ICD询问后平均54天以及下次预定就诊前56天发出。因此,获得了56天的反应时间以避免不良事件。
在所有与导线相关的ICD并发症中,91%可通过HM系统的警报正确诊断。大多数情况下,首次发送的事件是伪迹感知过度,被错误检测为心室颤动——室颤区。自动HM监测系统使医生能够早期发现严重的导线问题并迅速做出反应;因此,它可能有潜力避免因导线故障和T波感知过度导致的不适当电击。