• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可下载软件算法减少了因植入式心脏复律除颤器导线断裂引起的不适当电击:一项前瞻性研究。

Downloadable software algorithm reduces inappropriate shocks caused by implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead fractures: a prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif., USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 2010 Oct 12;122(15):1449-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.962407. Epub 2010 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.962407
PMID:20876433
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Downloadable software upgrades are common in consumer electronics but not in implantable medical devices. Fractures of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads present commonly as inappropriate shocks. A lead-integrity alert (LIA) designed to reduce inappropriate shocks is the first software download approved to enhance nominally functioning, previously implanted ICDs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a prospective study to determine whether an LIA could reduce inappropriate shocks. Patients were included if they had ICD lead fractures confirmed by analysis of explanted leads. The LIA group included the first 213 patients who met the inclusion criteria after the LIA was approved who had the LIA downloaded. The LIA is triggered either by high impedance or rapid oversensing. It responds by delaying detection of ventricular fibrillation and initiating a patient alert every 4 hours. The control group included the first 213 patients who did not have the LIA downloaded. They were monitored by conventional daily impedance measurements that respond with a daily alert. The LIA group had a 46% relative reduction (95% confidence interval 34% to 55%) in the percentage of patients with ≥1 inappropriate shock (LIA 38% versus control 70%, P<0.001) and a 50% relative reduction (95% confidence interval 33% to 61%) in the percentage with ≥5 shocks (25% versus 50%, P<0.001). The LIA group also had a higher percentage of patients who either did not receive a shock or had ≥3 days of warning before the shock (72% versus 50%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A software download that upgrades previously implanted ICDs without surgical revision reduces inappropriate shocks caused by lead fractures.

摘要

背景

可下载软件升级在消费电子产品中很常见,但在植入式医疗设备中却并非如此。植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)导线的断裂通常表现为不适当的电击。一种旨在减少不适当电击的导线完整性警报(LIA)是第一种经批准用于增强名义上正常、先前植入的 ICD 的软件下载。

方法和结果

我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,以确定 LIA 是否可以减少不适当的电击。如果通过对取出的导线进行分析确认 ICD 导线断裂,则患者符合纳入标准。LIA 组包括在 LIA 获得批准后符合纳入标准的前 213 名患者,这些患者下载了 LIA。LIA 由高阻抗或快速过感知触发。它的反应是延迟检测心室颤动,并每 4 小时启动一次患者警报。对照组包括前 213 名未下载 LIA 的患者。他们通过常规的每日阻抗测量进行监测,该测量会在每天发出警报。LIA 组的≥1 次不适当电击(LIA 组 38%,对照组 70%,P<0.001)和≥5 次电击(LIA 组 25%,对照组 50%,P<0.001)的患者比例分别降低了 46%(95%置信区间为 34%至 55%)和 50%(95%置信区间为 33%至 61%)。LIA 组也有更高比例的患者没有接受电击或在电击前有≥3 天的预警(LIA 组 72%,对照组 50%,P<0.001)。

结论

无需手术修正即可对先前植入的 ICD 进行软件升级的下载可减少因导线断裂引起的不适当电击。

相似文献

1
Downloadable software algorithm reduces inappropriate shocks caused by implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead fractures: a prospective study.可下载软件算法减少了因植入式心脏复律除颤器导线断裂引起的不适当电击:一项前瞻性研究。
Circulation. 2010 Oct 12;122(15):1449-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.962407. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
2
Downloadable algorithm to reduce inappropriate shocks caused by fractures of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.可下载算法,用于减少植入式心脏复律除颤器导线骨折引起的不适当电击。
Circulation. 2008 Nov 18;118(21):2122-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.796136. Epub 2008 Nov 3.
3
Potential role of home monitoring to reduce inappropriate shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients due to lead failure.家庭监测在减少植入式心脏复律除颤器患者因导线故障导致的不适当电击方面的潜在作用。
Europace. 2009 Apr;11(4):483-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun350. Epub 2008 Dec 22.
4
Lead integrity alert algorithm decreases inappropriate shocks in patients who have Sprint Fidelis pace-sense conductor fractures.导联完整性警示算法可降低 Sprint Fidelis 起搏感知导线断裂患者中不适当电击的发生率。
Heart Rhythm. 2010 Aug;7(8):1048-55. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.05.015. Epub 2010 May 21.
5
An algorithm to predict implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure.一种预测植入式心脏复律除颤器导线故障的算法。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Nov 2;44(9):1898-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.042.
6
Prevention of inappropriate ICD shocks due to lead insulation failure by continuous monitoring and automatic alert.通过持续监测和自动警报预防因导线绝缘故障导致的不适当植入式心律转复除颤器电击
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun;35(6):e150-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03316.x. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
7
Performance of Lead Integrity Alert to assist in the clinical diagnosis of implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead failures: analysis of different implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.导丝完整性报警在协助植入型心律转复除颤器导线故障临床诊断中的性能:不同植入型心律转复除颤器导线分析。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec;6(6):1169-77. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000744. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
8
Inappropriate shocks in patients with Fidelis® lead fractures: impact of remote monitoring and the lead integrity algorithm.带有 Fidelis® 导联断裂的患者中的不适当电击:远程监测和导联完整性算法的影响。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011 Oct;22(10):1107-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02077.x. Epub 2011 May 3.
9
Safety, efficacy, and performance of new discrimination algorithms to reduce inappropriate and unnecessary shocks: the PainFree SST clinical study design.新的甄别算法减少不适当和不必要电击的安全性、有效性和性能:PainFree SST 临床研究设计。
Europace. 2011 Oct;13(10):1484-93. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur133. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
10
Device complications and inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.肥厚型心肌病患者的器械并发症及不适当的植入式心脏复律除颤器电击
Heart. 2009 May;95(9):709-14. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.150656. Epub 2009 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Complications Related to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.与心脏植入式电子设备相关的长期并发症
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 18;14(6):2058. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062058.
2
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Tachycardia Therapies: Past, Present and Future Directions.植入式心脏复律除颤器心动过速治疗:过去、现在与未来方向
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Mar 20;11(3):92. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11030092.
3
Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices and disease management.心脏植入式电子设备的远程监测和疾病管理。
Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad233.
4
Time course of oversensing and impedance changes in developing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead fracture.植入式心脏复律除颤器导线在发生断裂过程中感知过度和阻抗变化的时间进程。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 Sep 21;3(6Part A):688-698. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.09.014. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Inappropriate detection of an intraventricular conduction delay as a lead failure due to an increase in the sensing integrity counter in a patient with a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator.在一名心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者中,由于感知完整性计数器增加,不恰当地将室内传导延迟检测为导线故障。
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2020 Oct 24;7(1):39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2020.10.010. eCollection 2021 Jan.
6
Failure of Lead Integrity Alert to detect implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead-system failure in a pacemaker-dependent patient.在一名起搏器依赖患者中,导联完整性警报未能检测到植入式心脏复律除颤器导联系统故障。
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2020 Aug 31;7(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2020.08.021. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
Lead Integrity Alert Triggered by T-wave Oversensing.T波过度感知触发的导联完整性警报
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2020 Feb 15;11(2):3983-3985. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2020.110204. eCollection 2020 Feb.
8
Contemporary benefit-harm profile over two decades in primary prophylactic ICD-therapy.二十余年来,初级预防 ICD 治疗的当代获益-危害特征。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Oct;42(10):866-872. doi: 10.1002/clc.23234. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
9
Failure to Treat Life-Threatening Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Contemporary Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Implications for Strategic Programming.当代植入式心脏复律除颤器中对危及生命的室性快速心律失常治疗失败:对策略性程控的影响
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Sep;10(9):e005305. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005305.
10
Chronic lead malposition diagnosis and management: discussion of two cases and literature review.慢性铅位置异常的诊断与管理:两例病例讨论及文献综述
Clin Case Rep. 2017 Feb 1;5(3):270-276. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.819. eCollection 2017 Mar.