Ching Siok Siong, Verbeke Caroline S, Homer-Vanniasinkam Shervanthi, McMahon Michael J
Academic Unit of Surgery, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Dec;18(6):819-24. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0066.
Torsional mode ultrasonic coagulating shears are an alternative device to linear mode shears for hemostatic cutting. The aim of this study was to compare the vessel-sealing quality of torsional and linear mode ultrasonic coagulating shears on human veins.
Veins were harvested from 15 patients during varicose vein surgery. Each vessel was sealed and cut by both devices at different sites. The seals were either tested for burst pressure or examined microscopically to compare mural thickness, seal length, and extent of coagulation and lateral thermal effect.
For veins 2.0-3.0 mm in diameter, the median burst pressure was higher on seals made with torsional mode shears (245, IQR 161-360 mm Hg vs. 133, IQR 101-165 mm Hg; P = 0.001). Similarly, for veins 3.5-4.5 mm in diameter, the median burst pressure was higher with torsional mode shears (149, IQR 118-212 mm Hg vs. 94, IQR 82-126 mm Hg; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the median burst pressure for veins 5.0-6.0 mm in diameter (82, IQR 61-132 mm Hg vs. 76, IQR 40-114 mm Hg; P = 0.268). Seals made with torsional mode shears showed significantly greater seal length (517 +/- 300 microm vs. 316 +/- 147 microm; P = 0.016), more tissue coagulation (467 +/- 197 microm vs. 335 +/- 128 microm; P = 0.015), and greater lateral thermal effect (1479 +/- 340 microm vs. 1116 +/- 253 mum; P < 0.001).
Torsional mode ultrasonic shears produced more secure seals on veins up to 4.5 mm in diameter. This can be explained by the greater seal length produced by torsional mode shears.
扭转模式超声凝固剪是一种用于止血切割的线性模式剪的替代设备。本研究的目的是比较扭转模式和线性模式超声凝固剪对人体静脉的血管封闭质量。
在静脉曲张手术期间从15名患者身上采集静脉。每个血管在不同部位用两种设备进行封闭和切割。对封闭处进行爆破压力测试或显微镜检查,以比较壁厚度、封闭长度、凝固范围和侧向热效应。
对于直径为2.0 - 3.0毫米的静脉,扭转模式剪制作的封闭处的中位爆破压力更高(245,四分位间距161 - 360毫米汞柱 vs. 133,四分位间距101 - 165毫米汞柱;P = 0.001)。同样,对于直径为3.5 - 4.5毫米的静脉,扭转模式剪的中位爆破压力更高(149,四分位间距118 - 212毫米汞柱 vs. 94,四分位间距82 - 126毫米汞柱;P = 0.001)。对于直径为5.0 - 6.0毫米的静脉,中位爆破压力没有显著差异(82,四分位间距61 - 132毫米汞柱 vs. 76,四分位间距40 - 114毫米汞柱;P = 0.268)。扭转模式剪制作的封闭处显示出显著更长的封闭长度(517±300微米 vs. 316±147微米;P = 0.016)、更多的组织凝固(467±197微米 vs. 335±128微米;P = 0.015)和更大的侧向热效应(1479±340微米 vs. 1116±253微米;P < 0.001)。
扭转模式超声剪对直径达4.5毫米的静脉产生更可靠的封闭。这可以通过扭转模式剪产生的更长的封闭长度来解释。