• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

5 毫米直径双极和超声剪在杂交猪颈动脉切割中的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and safety of 5-mm-diameter bipolar and ultrasonic shears for cutting carotid arteries of the hybrid pig.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke-University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):577-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1224-6. Epub 2010 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-1224-6
PMID:20614136
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Experimental data about the efficacy and safety of sealing devices are rare. Therefore, this study investigated these parameters for three commercially available energy-based vascular sealing and cutting systems.

METHODS

In male hybrid pigs, 487 carotid artery segments were sealed and cut using the harmonic scalpel or several bipolar sealing devices. The sealing failure rate, burst pressure, process time, and extent of lateral thermal damage were analyzed.

RESULTS

A regular sealing and cutting process in more than 90% of the carotid arteries was found using the following instruments: LS1520, ACE (level 1), ACE (level 3), CS14C (level 1), WAVE (level 1), and WAVE (level 5). The largest failure rate was found for the CS14C device (level 5: initial sealing failure, 21.5%). The maximal mean burst pressure (1727±453 mmHg) was reached using the ACE device (level 1). Significant differences were found in the size of the lateral thermal damage, which a ranged from 2.5 mm (LS1520) to 1.51 mm (CS14C, level 1). The process time ranged widely from 6.8 s (ACE, level 5) to 31.83 s (WAVE, level 1).

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that all the tested devices are efficacious and safe in sealing and cutting arteries up to 5 mm in diameter. All the devices showed supraphysiologic mean burst pressures. Differences in failure rate, thermal damage, and process time lead to an advised application of the different systems.

摘要

背景

关于密封设备疗效和安全性的实验数据较为匮乏。因此,本研究调查了三种市售的基于能量的血管密封切割系统的这些参数。

方法

在雄性杂交猪中,使用超声刀或几种双极密封设备对 487 段颈总动脉进行了密封和切割。分析了密封失败率、爆破压力、处理时间和侧向热损伤程度。

结果

以下仪器在超过 90%的颈总动脉中实现了常规的密封和切割过程:LS1520、ACE(级别 1)、ACE(级别 3)、CS14C(级别 1)、WAVE(级别 1)和 WAVE(级别 5)。CS14C 设备的失败率最高(级别 5:初始密封失败率为 21.5%)。ACE 设备(级别 1)达到的最大平均爆破压力(1727±453mmHg)最高。侧向热损伤的大小差异显著,范围从 2.5mm(LS1520)到 1.51mm(CS14C,级别 1)。处理时间范围很广,从 6.8s(ACE,级别 5)到 31.83s(WAVE,级别 1)。

结论

本研究表明,所有测试的设备在密封和切割直径达 5mm 的动脉时均有效且安全。所有设备均显示出超生理的平均爆破压力。失败率、热损伤和处理时间的差异导致建议应用不同的系统。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of 5-mm-diameter bipolar and ultrasonic shears for cutting carotid arteries of the hybrid pig.5 毫米直径双极和超声剪在杂交猪颈动脉切割中的疗效和安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):577-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1224-6. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
2
Comparison of linear and torsional mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for the sealing of medium- to large-sized arteries.用于中大型动脉封闭的线性模式与扭转模式超声凝固剪的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jul;21(7):1165-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9113-8. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
3
Comparison of torsional and linear mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for sealing veins.用于静脉封闭的扭转模式与线性模式超声凝固剪的比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Dec;18(6):819-24. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0066.
4
Comparison of blood vessel sealing among new electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices.新型电外科和超声设备血管封闭效果的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jan;23(1):90-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9932-x. Epub 2008 May 16.
5
PlasmaKinetic bipolar vessel sealing: burst pressures and thermal spread in an animal model.等离子体动力学双极血管闭合:动物模型中的破裂压力和热扩散
J Endourol. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(1):107-10. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.107.
6
Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries.超声能量、双极热能和血管夹用于小、中、大型动脉止血的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Aug;17(8):1228-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8833-7. Epub 2003 Jun 13.
7
Validation of a Laparoscopic Ferromagnetic Technology-based Vessel Sealing Device and Comparative Study to Ultrasonic and Bipolar Laparoscopic Devices.基于腹腔镜铁磁技术的血管封闭装置的验证及与超声和双极腹腔镜装置的对比研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Apr;27(2):e12-e17. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000385.
8
Sealing the thoracic duct with ultrasonic coagulating shears.用超声凝固剪封闭胸导管。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Jul-Aug;52(64):1053-6.
9
Evaluation of surgical energy devices for vessel sealing and peripheral energy spread in a porcine model.在猪模型中评估用于血管封闭和周边能量扩散的手术能量设备。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2689-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.121. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
10
Experimental comparison of mesenteric vessel sealing and thermal damage between one bipolar and two ultrasonic shears devices.单极双极与双极超声剪在肠系膜血管封闭与热损伤方面的实验比较。
Br J Surg. 2011 Jun;98(6):797-800. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7433. Epub 2011 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
New Bipolar Electrosurgical Vessel Sealing Device Provides Improved Performance and Procedural Efficiency.新型双极电外科血管闭合装置性能更优,操作效率更高。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2025 Jan 25;18:75-86. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S498873. eCollection 2025.
2
Safety and effectiveness of a novel generator algorithm for bipolar vessel sealing: a randomised controlled chronic animal study.新型双极血管密封发生器算法的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照慢性动物研究。
BMC Surg. 2019 Nov 5;19(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0625-2.
3
Evaluation of a novel electrosurgical sealing mode in an ex vivo and in vivo porcine model.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of safety and efficacy of ultrasonic and bipolar thermal energy: an experimental study.超声与双极热能的安全性和有效性比较:一项实验研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Aug;18(4):384-90. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31816f85c9.
2
Comparison of four energy-based vascular sealing and cutting instruments: A porcine model.四种基于能量的血管封闭和切割器械的比较:猪模型
Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):534-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9619-8. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
3
Evaluation of surgical energy devices for vessel sealing and peripheral energy spread in a porcine model.
评估一种新型电外科密封模式在离体和活体猪模型中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1456-1463. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5832-2. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
4
Sealing vessels up to 7 mm in diameter solely with ultrasonic technology.仅使用超声技术密封直径达7毫米的血管。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Jul 30;7:263-71. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S66848. eCollection 2014.
5
Harmonic scalpel versus conventional haemostasis in neck dissection: a prospective randomized study.谐波手术刀与传统止血方法在颈部解剖中的应用:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Int J Surg Oncol. 2013;2013:369345. doi: 10.1155/2013/369345. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
6
A prospective, randomized clinical comparison between UltraCision and the novel sealing and cutting device BiCision in patients with laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.一项在腹腔镜下子宫次全切除术患者中,对超声刀与新型的封闭切割装置 B i Cision 行前瞻性、随机临床对比的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3852-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2994-4. Epub 2013 May 14.
7
Common uses and cited complications of energy in surgery.手术中能量的常见用途和引用的并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Sep;27(9):3056-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2823-9. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
8
Energetic soft-tissue treatment technologies: an overview of procedural fundamentals and safety factors.高能软组织治疗技术:程序基础和安全因素概述。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Sep;27(9):3085-99. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2923-6. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
9
Efficacy and safety of the novel electrosurgical vessel sealing and cutting instrument BiCision®.新型电外科血管封闭切割器械BiCision®的疗效与安全性
Surg Endosc. 2012 Nov;26(11):3334-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2337-x. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
10
Safety and efficacy of new integrated bipolar and ultrasonic scissors compared to conventional laparoscopic 5-mm sealing and cutting instruments.新型集成双极和超声剪刀与传统腹腔镜 5mm 密封切割器械的安全性和有效性比较。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2541-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2229-0. Epub 2012 Mar 24.
在猪模型中评估用于血管封闭和周边能量扩散的手术能量设备。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2689-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.121. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
4
In vivo comparison of the coagulation capability of SonoSurg and Harmonic Ace on 4 mm and 5 mm arteries.
Surg Endosc. 2007 Dec;21(12):2203-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9345-2. Epub 2007 May 4.
5
Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study.腹腔镜结肠切除术中电热双极血管闭合装置与超声凝固剪的比较研究
Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1526-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9143-2. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
6
Comparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure.单极电凝、双极电凝、超声刀及结扎速血管闭合系统的比较
Surg Today. 2006;36(10):908-13. doi: 10.1007/s00595-006-3254-1.
7
Efficacy and quality of vessel sealing: comparison of a reusable with a disposable device and effects of clamp surface geometry and structure.血管闭合的疗效与质量:可重复使用设备与一次性设备的比较以及钳夹表面几何形状和结构的影响
Surg Endosc. 2006 Jun;20(6):890-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0380-6. Epub 2006 May 12.
8
Differential response of arteries and veins to bipolar vessel sealing: evaluation of a novel reusable device.动脉和静脉对双极血管封闭的不同反应:一种新型可重复使用装置的评估
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006 Apr;16(2):149-55. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.149.
9
Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis.腹腔镜结肠切除术的能量来源:传统电外科、双极计算机控制电外科与超声解剖的前瞻性随机比较。手术结果及成本分析。
Surg Innov. 2005 Dec;12(4):339-44. doi: 10.1177/155335060501200409.
10
Bursting tension of medium and large canine arteries sealed with ultrasonic energy or suture ligation.
Vet Surg. 2005 May-Jun;34(3):289-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2005.00043.x.