VanRaden P M, Van Tassell C P, Wiggans G R, Sonstegard T S, Schnabel R D, Taylor J F, Schenkel F S
Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350, USA.
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jan;92(1):16-24. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1514.
Genetic progress will increase when breeders examine genotypes in addition to pedigrees and phenotypes. Genotypes for 38,416 markers and August 2003 genetic evaluations for 3,576 Holstein bulls born before 1999 were used to predict January 2008 daughter deviations for 1,759 bulls born from 1999 through 2002. Genotypes were generated using the Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip and DNA from semen contributed by US and Canadian artificial-insemination organizations to the Cooperative Dairy DNA Repository. Genomic predictions for 5 yield traits, 5 fitness traits, 16 conformation traits, and net merit were computed using a linear model with an assumed normal distribution for marker effects and also using a nonlinear model with a heavier tailed prior distribution to account for major genes. The official parent average from 2003 and a 2003 parent average computed from only the subset of genotyped ancestors were combined with genomic predictions using a selection index. Combined predictions were more accurate than official parent averages for all 27 traits. The coefficients of determination (R(2)) were 0.05 to 0.38 greater with nonlinear genomic predictions included compared with those from parent average alone. Linear genomic predictions had R(2) values similar to those from nonlinear predictions but averaged just 0.01 lower. The greatest benefits of genomic prediction were for fat percentage because of a known gene with a large effect. The R(2) values were converted to realized reliabilities by dividing by mean reliability of 2008 daughter deviations and then adding the difference between published and observed reliabilities of 2003 parent averages. When averaged across all traits, combined genomic predictions had realized reliabilities that were 23% greater than reliabilities of parent averages (50 vs. 27%), and gains in information were equivalent to 11 additional daughter records. Reliability increased more by doubling the number of bulls genotyped than the number of markers genotyped. Genomic prediction improves reliability by tracing the inheritance of genes even with small effects.
当育种者除了考虑谱系和表型之外还检查基因型时,遗传进展将会增加。利用38416个标记的基因型以及对1999年之前出生的3576头荷斯坦公牛的2003年8月遗传评估结果,来预测1999年至2002年出生的1759头公牛在2008年1月的女儿偏差。基因型是使用Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip以及美国和加拿大人工授精组织提供给合作奶牛DNA库的精液中的DNA生成的。使用标记效应呈假定正态分布的线性模型以及具有更重尾先验分布以考虑主基因的非线性模型,计算了5个产量性状、5个健康性状、16个体型性状和净效益的基因组预测值。2003年的官方亲本平均值以及仅根据已分型祖先子集计算的2003年亲本平均值,使用选择指数与基因组预测值相结合。对于所有27个性状,组合预测比官方亲本平均值更准确。与仅来自亲本平均值的预测相比,纳入非线性基因组预测时,决定系数(R²)高出0.05至0.38。线性基因组预测的R²值与非线性预测的相似,但平均仅低0.01。由于一个已知的具有大效应的基因,基因组预测对乳脂率的益处最大。通过将R²值除以2008年女儿偏差的平均可靠性,然后加上2003年亲本平均值公布的可靠性与观察到的可靠性之间的差异,将R²值转换为实际可靠性。在所有性状上进行平均时,组合基因组预测的实际可靠性比亲本平均值的可靠性高23%(分别为50%和27%),信息增益相当于增加了11条额外的女儿记录。通过将进行基因分型的公牛数量翻倍,可靠性的增加比进行基因分型的标记数量翻倍时更多。即使对于效应较小的基因,基因组预测也能通过追踪基因的遗传来提高可靠性。