• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者绩效薪酬研究议程

P4P4P: an agenda for research on pay-for-performance for patients.

作者信息

Volpp Kevin G, Pauly Mark V, Loewenstein George, Bangsberg David

机构信息

Center for Health Incentives, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):206-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.206.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.206
PMID:19124872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3507539/
Abstract

Unhealthy behavior is a major cause of poor health outcomes and high health care costs. In this paper we describe an agenda for research to guide broader use of patient-targeted financial incentives, either in conjunction with provider-targeted financial incentives (pay-for-performance, or P4P) or in clinical contexts where provider-targeted approaches are unlikely to be effective. We discuss evidence of proven effectiveness and limitations of the existing evidence, reasons for underuse of these approaches, and options for achieving wider use. Patient-targeted incentives have great potential, and systematic testing will help determine how they can best be used to improve population health.

摘要

不健康行为是导致健康状况不佳和医疗成本高昂的主要原因。在本文中,我们描述了一项研究议程,以指导更广泛地使用针对患者的经济激励措施,这些措施可以与针对提供者的经济激励措施(绩效薪酬,即P4P)相结合,或者在针对提供者的方法不太可能有效的临床环境中使用。我们讨论了已证实的有效性证据和现有证据的局限性、这些方法未得到充分使用的原因,以及实现更广泛使用的选择。针对患者的激励措施具有巨大潜力,系统测试将有助于确定如何最好地利用它们来改善人群健康。

相似文献

1
P4P4P: an agenda for research on pay-for-performance for patients.患者绩效薪酬研究议程
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):206-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.206.
2
Can multi-level research help us design pay-for-performance programs?多层次研究能否帮助我们设计绩效薪酬方案?
Med Care. 2008 Feb;46(2):109-11. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318165b987.
3
Key issues in the design of pay for performance programs.绩效薪酬计划设计中的关键问题。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Feb;14(1):117-31. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0347-6. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
4
Pay-for-performance as a method to establish the business case for quality.按绩效付费作为建立质量商业案例的一种方法。
J Health Care Finance. 2007 Summer;33(4):17-30.
5
Pay for performance (P4P).按绩效付费(P4P)。
Bull Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;91(1):62.
6
Using the lessons of behavioral economics to design more effective pay-for-performance programs.利用行为经济学的经验教训来设计更有效的按绩效付费计划。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jul;16(7):497-503.
7
Lessons from evaluations of purchaser pay-for-performance programs: a review of the evidence.购买者绩效薪酬计划评估的经验教训:证据综述
Med Care Res Rev. 2008 Dec;65(6 Suppl):5S-35S. doi: 10.1177/1077558708324236.
8
Pay for performance and medical professionalism.绩效薪酬与医学专业精神。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2008 Jan-Mar;17(1):9-18. doi: 10.1097/01.QMH.0000308633.81979.7b.
9
P4P undermined by too many measures, weak incentives and little proof that it works.按绩效付费受到过多措施、微弱激励以及几乎没有证据表明其有效的影响。
Hosp Health Netw. 2007 Oct;81(10):68.
10
Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.系统评价:医疗保健中绩效付费的效果、设计选择和背景。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 23;10:247. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-247.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Games to Simulate Medication Adherence and Nonadherence: Laboratory Experiment in Gamified Behavioral Simulation.利用游戏模拟药物依从性和不依从性:游戏化行为模拟的实验室实验
JMIR Serious Games. 2024 Sep 24;12:e47141. doi: 10.2196/47141.
2
Patient-centered care in diabetes care-concepts, relationships and practice.糖尿病护理中的以患者为中心的护理——概念、关系与实践
World J Diabetes. 2024 Jul 15;15(7):1417-1429. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i7.1417.
3
Financial incentive interventions for smoking cessation among Chinese smokers: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.财务激励干预措施对中国烟民戒烟的影响:一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 29;14(4):e080344. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080344.
4
Ethical implications of economic compensation for voluntary medical male circumcision for HIV prevention and epidemic control.自愿医学男性包皮环切术预防艾滋病及防控疫情的经济补偿所涉及的伦理问题
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec 16;2(12):e0001361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001361. eCollection 2022.
5
Contingency management and cognitive behavior therapy for smoking cessation among veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: Design and methodology of a randomized clinical trial.创伤后应激障碍退伍军人戒烟的应急管理和认知行为疗法:一项随机临床试验的设计和方法。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106839. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106839. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
6
BEHAVIORAL HAZARD IN HEALTH INSURANCE.健康保险中的行为风险
Q J Econ. 2015 Nov;130(4):1623-1667. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjv029. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
A Pragmatic Intervention Using Financial Incentives for Pregnancy Weight Management: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.一项使用经济激励措施进行孕期体重管理的实用干预措施:可行性随机对照试验。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Dec 24;5(12):e30578. doi: 10.2196/30578.
8
Increasing the Impact of Interventions Incentivizing Psychiatric Treatment Engagement: Challenges and Opportunities.增加激励精神科治疗参与干预措施的影响:挑战与机遇。
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 May;73(5):580-583. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100100. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
9
Renewed vision on pulmonary rehabilitation service delivery for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management beyond COVID-19.对慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理中肺康复服务提供的新见解:超越新冠疫情
Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2021 Feb 6;7(2):107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2021.01.003. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Randomized clinical trial to determine the effectiveness of CO-oximetry and anti-smoking brief advice in a cohort of kidney transplant patients who smoke.一项随机临床试验,旨在确定 CO- 分光光度法和戒烟简短建议在吸烟的肾移植患者队列中的有效性。
Int J Med Sci. 2020 Sep 23;17(17):2673-2684. doi: 10.7150/ijms.49401. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient opinions regarding 'pay for performance for patients'.患者对“患者绩效薪酬”的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Oct;23(10):1647-52. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0739-1. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
2
Wellness programs and lifestyle discrimination--the legal limits.健康计划与生活方式歧视——法律界限
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 10;359(2):192-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhle0801929.
3
Paying for performance: the power of incentives over habits.为绩效付费:激励对习惯的影响力。
Health Econ. 2008 Apr;17(4):449-51. doi: 10.1002/hec.1350.
4
Asymmetric paternalism to improve health behaviors.改善健康行为的不对称家长式作风。
JAMA. 2007 Nov 28;298(20):2415-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.20.2415.
5
Shattuck Lecture. We can do better--improving the health of the American people.沙塔克讲座。我们可以做得更好——改善美国人民的健康。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Sep 20;357(12):1221-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa073350.
6
A pilot study testing the effect of different levels of financial incentives on weight loss among overweight employees.一项试点研究,测试不同程度的经济激励对超重员工体重减轻的影响。
J Occup Environ Med. 2007 Sep;49(9):981-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31813c6dcb.
7
Cost-effectiveness of prize-based contingency management in methadone maintenance treatment programs.基于奖励的应急管理在美沙酮维持治疗项目中的成本效益
Addiction. 2007 Sep;102(9):1463-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01913.x. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
8
Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死的绩效薪酬、医疗质量与治疗结果
JAMA. 2007 Jun 6;297(21):2373-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.21.2373.
9
What do we get for our money? Cost-effectiveness of adding contingency management.我们的钱花得值吗?增加应急管理的成本效益。
Addiction. 2007 Feb;102(2):309-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01689.x.
10
Impact of medication therapy discontinuation on mortality after myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后药物治疗中断对死亡率的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Sep 25;166(17):1842-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.17.1842.