Rossi Stephen J, Buford Thomas W, Smith Douglas B, Kennel Robin, Haff Erin E, Haff G Gregory
Human Performance Laboratory, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA.
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2007 Jun;2(2):150-8. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2.2.150.
The primary purpose of this study was to simultaneously analyze both ends of the barbell with 19 weightlifters (age 18.0 +/- 3.2 years, body mass 84.0 +/- 14.2 kg, height 167.3 +/- 8.7 cm) participating in a weightlifting competition to determine whether there were asymmetries in barbell kinematics and kinetics between the right and left sides of the barbell. The second purpose was to compare barbell-trajectory classification of the snatch and clean lifts between the right and left sides of the barbell.
Barbell kinematic and kinetic data were collected and analyzed with 2 VS-120 weightlifting-analysis systems (Lipman Electronic Engineering Ltd, Ramat Hahayal, Israel). Barbell trajectories (A, B, and C) for the right and left sides were analyzed for each lift.
No significant difference was found in trajectory classification between sides of the barbell for either lift. The frequencies analysis revealed that type C barbell trajectories were the most prevalent in each lift. When the right and left sides of the barbell were compared during the snatch and clean, no significant differences were determined for any kinematic or kinetic variables.
The V-scope system appears to facilitate analysis of barbell kinematics, kinetics, and trajectories during weightlifting competition regardless of which side of the barbell is analyzed.
本研究的主要目的是对19名参加举重比赛的举重运动员(年龄18.0±3.2岁,体重84.0±14.2千克,身高167.3±8.7厘米)的杠铃两端同时进行分析,以确定杠铃左右两侧在运动学和动力学方面是否存在不对称性。第二个目的是比较杠铃左右两侧抓举和挺举的杠铃轨迹分类。
使用2套VS - 120举重分析系统(以色列拉马特哈海亚尔的利普曼电子工程有限公司)收集和分析杠铃运动学和动力学数据。对每次试举的杠铃左右两侧轨迹(A、B和C)进行分析。
两种试举中,杠铃两侧的轨迹分类均未发现显著差异。频率分析显示,C型杠铃轨迹在每次试举中最为普遍。在抓举和挺举过程中比较杠铃左右两侧时,未发现任何运动学或动力学变量存在显著差异。
无论分析杠铃的哪一侧,V - scope系统似乎都有助于在举重比赛期间对杠铃的运动学、动力学和轨迹进行分析。