Evans Jonathan J, Greenfield Eve, Wilson Barbara A, Bateman Andrew
Section of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Jan;15(1):112-20. doi: 10.1017/S1355617708090152.
Using randomized control trial methodology, we evaluated the effectiveness of a 5-week cognitive-motor dual-tasking training program developed to improve performance of a group of people with dual-tasking difficulties arising from acquired brain injury. Training involved twice-daily practice on exercises involving walking being combined with tasks which increased in cognitive demand over the course of the intervention. A treatment group (n = 10) was compared with a control group (n = 9). The primary outcome measure was a task requiring participants to walk and carry out a spoken sentence verification task simultaneously. Secondary outcome measures were measures of dual-tasking involving either two motor tasks or two cognitive tasks. A questionnaire measure relating to activities of daily living requiring dual-tasking was also completed. Compliance with the training program was good. We found evidence of improvement in performance on the primary outcome measure, but little evidence of generalization to other measures. There was some evidence that participants believed that their dual-tasking performance in everyday life was improved after the intervention. The study was limited in terms of sample size, was not blinded and did not control fully for therapist contact time, but has produced valuable data relating to effect sizes associated with this form of intervention. (JINS, 2009, 15, 112-120.).
我们采用随机对照试验方法,评估了一项为期5周的认知 - 运动双任务训练计划的有效性。该训练计划旨在提高一组因后天脑损伤而存在双任务困难的人群的表现。训练包括每天两次练习,将行走练习与在干预过程中认知需求不断增加的任务相结合。将一个治疗组(n = 10)与一个对照组(n = 9)进行比较。主要结局指标是一项要求参与者同时行走并执行口语句子验证任务的测试。次要结局指标是涉及两个运动任务或两个认知任务的双任务测试。还完成了一份与需要双任务的日常生活活动相关的问卷调查。训练计划的依从性良好。我们发现主要结局指标的表现有改善的证据,但几乎没有证据表明这种改善能推广到其他指标。有一些证据表明,参与者认为干预后他们在日常生活中的双任务表现有所改善。该研究在样本量方面存在局限性,未设盲且未完全控制治疗师接触时间,但已产生了与这种干预形式相关的效应量的有价值数据。(《神经心理学杂志》,2009年,第15卷,第112 - 120页)