Suppr超能文献

为什么(最优秀的)女性如此擅长国际象棋?智力领域的参与率和性别差异。

Why are (the best) women so good at chess? Participation rates and gender differences in intellectual domains.

作者信息

Bilalić Merim, Smallbone Kieran, McLeod Peter, Gobet Fernand

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 22;276(1659):1161-5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1576.

Abstract

A popular explanation for the small number of women at the top level of intellectually demanding activities from chess to science appeals to biological differences in the intellectual abilities of men and women. An alternative explanation is that the extreme values in a large sample are likely to be greater than those in a small one. Although the performance of the 100 best German male chess players is better than that of the 100 best German women, we show that 96 per cent of the observed difference would be expected given the much greater number of men who play chess. There is little left for biological or cultural explanations to account for. In science, where there are many more male than female participants, this statistical sampling explanation, rather than differences in intellectual ability, may also be the main reason why women are under-represented at the top end.

摘要

对于从国际象棋到科学等需要高智力活动的顶级领域中女性人数较少这一现象,一种普遍的解释是男女在智力能力上存在生物学差异。另一种解释是,大样本中的极端值可能比小样本中的更大。尽管德国排名前100的男性国际象棋棋手的表现优于排名前100的女性棋手,但我们表明,考虑到下国际象棋的男性人数远多于女性,观察到的差异中有96%是可以预期的。几乎没有什么可归因于生物学或文化解释的了。在科学领域,男性参与者比女性多得多,这种统计抽样解释,而非智力能力的差异,可能也是女性在顶尖水平上代表性不足的主要原因。

相似文献

2
How intellectual is chess? -- a reply to Howard.国际象棋有多具智力性?——对霍华德的回应。
J Biosoc Sci. 2006 May;38(3):419-21. doi: 10.1017/S0021932005001185. Epub 2006 Jan 27.
6
Female Chess Players Outperform Expectations When Playing Men.女性棋手在与男性对弈时表现优于预期。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;29(3):429-436. doi: 10.1177/0956797617736887. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
9
Visuospatial abilities of chess players.国际象棋棋手的视觉空间能力。
Br J Psychol. 2002 Nov;93(Pt 4):557-65. doi: 10.1348/000712602761381402.

引用本文的文献

7
Restricting range restricts conclusions.限制范围会限制结论。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 12;5:569. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00569. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验