Suppr超能文献

强直性脊柱炎临床试验中使用的评估方法:综述

Methods of assessment used in ankylosing spondylitis clinical trials: a review.

作者信息

Laurent M R, Buchanan W W, Bellamy N

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Rheumatol. 1991 Oct;30(5):326-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/30.5.326.

Abstract

Twenty non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) trials in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were reviewed to assess the frequency with which statistically significant differences had been detected between active drug and either a placebo or an NSAID-free washout period. Differences in pain severity were almost invariability detected, irrespective of the scale employed. In contrast, significant differences in axial movement were rarely detected in placebo controlled studies, and only about half of the variables detected significant improvement with respect to a washout period. From our data it is difficult to differentiate whether the lack of difference with active therapy was due to inadequate sample size, non-responsive patients, or insensitive outcome measures. However, it is not surprising that between-drug differences are rarely detected in AS clinical trials of NSAIDs given our current inability to differentiate consistently an active treatment from a placebo and an active treatment phase from a washout period.

摘要

对20项关于强直性脊柱炎(AS)的非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)试验进行了综述,以评估活性药物与安慰剂或无NSAID洗脱期之间检测到统计学显著差异的频率。无论采用何种量表,几乎总能检测到疼痛严重程度的差异。相比之下,在安慰剂对照研究中很少检测到轴向运动的显著差异,并且只有约一半的变量相对于洗脱期检测到显著改善。从我们的数据中很难区分活性治疗缺乏差异是由于样本量不足、无反应患者还是不敏感的结局指标。然而,鉴于我们目前无法始终如一地将活性治疗与安慰剂区分开来,以及将活性治疗阶段与洗脱期区分开来,在NSAIDs的AS临床试验中很少检测到药物间差异也就不足为奇了。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验