Paris-Descartes University, UPRES-EA 4058, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Paris 14, France.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Feb;64(2):290-4. doi: 10.1002/acr.20671.
To evaluate the interest of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) score as a quality indicator and a potential outcome measure in clinical studies.
We used data from patients with active, advanced, axial ankylosing spondylitis refractory to NSAIDs. The study design was a 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled period followed by a 12-week open-label extension. The ASAS-NSAID score was collected during 3 periods of interest (i.e., the 12 weeks preceding baseline, the 12 weeks of the placebo-controlled trial, and the 12 weeks of the open-label trial).
For the 82 enrolled patients, the mean ± SD ASAS-NSAID score at baseline was similar between the 2 groups: 93 ± 76 and 74 ± 54 in the etanercept and placebo groups, respectively. There was no significant change in the ASAS-NSAID score during the first part of the trial, as recommended by the protocol. There was a statistically significant decrease in the ASAS-NSAID score during the second part of the trial with a relevant effect size (-0.56) in the placebo to etanercept group.
This study confirms the feasibility and simplicity of the ASAS-NSAID score and suggests that such a score be integrated in all studies in spondylarthritis either to check the quality of the observed data (i.e., intergroup baseline characteristics) or to evaluate the NSAID-sparing effect of other therapies.
评估强直性脊柱炎评估国际协会(ASAS)非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)评分作为临床研究中的质量指标和潜在结局测量的意义。
我们使用了来自活动性、晚期、轴性强直性脊柱炎患者的数据,这些患者对 NSAID 治疗无效。研究设计为 12 周的随机、安慰剂对照期,随后进行 12 周的开放标签扩展期。在 3 个感兴趣的时期(即基线前的 12 周、安慰剂对照试验的 12 周和开放标签试验的 12 周)收集 ASAS-NSAID 评分。
对于 82 名入组患者,依那西普和安慰剂组的基线时平均±SD ASAS-NSAID 评分相似:分别为 93±76 和 74±54。按照方案建议,试验的第一部分中 ASAS-NSAID 评分没有明显变化。在试验的第二部分中,ASAS-NSAID 评分有统计学显著下降,安慰剂到依那西普组的相关效应大小为-0.56。
这项研究证实了 ASAS-NSAID 评分的可行性和简单性,并表明在所有脊柱关节炎研究中都应纳入此类评分,以检查观察数据的质量(即组间基线特征)或评估其他治疗方法的 NSAID 节省效应。