Habermann C R, Arndt C, Graessner J, Diestel L, Petersen K U, Reitmeier F, Ussmueller J O, Adam G, Jaehne M
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Diagnostic Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Mar;30(3):591-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1412. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
Our aim was to determine the value of echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging (epiDWI) in differentiating various types of primary parotid gland tumors.
One hundred forty-nine consecutive patients with suspected tumors of the parotid gland were examined with an epiDWI sequence by using a 1.5T unit. Image analysis was performed by 2 radiologists independently, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was computed. Histologic diagnosis was obtained in every patient. For comparison of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs), a paired 2-tailed Student t test with a Bonferroni correction was used.
In 136 patients, a primary parotid gland tumor was confirmed by histology. Among the observers, a high correlation was calculated (0.98). ADC values of pleomorphic adenomas were significantly higher than those of all other entities, except for myoepithelial adenomas (P = .054). ADC values of Warthin tumors were different from those of myoepithelial adenomas, lipomas, and salivary duct carcinomas (P < .001, 0.013, and .037, respectively). Mucoepidermoid carcinomas, acinic cell carcinomas, and basal cell adenocarcinomas were not differentiable from Warthin tumors (P = .094, .396, and .604, respectively).
epiDWI has the potential to differentiate pleomorphic adenoma and myoepithelial adenomas from all other examined entities. Due to an overlap not only within the group of benign and malignant lesions but also between groups, diagnoses should not be addressed on the basis of ADC values solely. Therefore, further studies combining DWI, morphologic criteria, and probably other MR imaging techniques seem warranted.
我们的目的是确定回波平面扩散加权磁共振成像(epiDWI)在鉴别各种类型原发性腮腺肿瘤中的价值。
149例连续的疑似腮腺肿瘤患者使用1.5T设备通过epiDWI序列进行检查。由2名放射科医生独立进行图像分析,并计算组内相关系数。所有患者均获得组织学诊断。为比较表观扩散系数(ADC),采用配对双尾Student t检验并进行Bonferroni校正。
136例患者经组织学证实为原发性腮腺肿瘤。观察者之间计算出高度相关性(0.98)。多形性腺瘤的ADC值显著高于除肌上皮腺瘤外的所有其他实体(P = 0.054)。沃辛瘤的ADC值与肌上皮腺瘤、脂肪瘤和涎腺导管癌的ADC值不同(分别为P < 0.001、0.013和0.037)。黏液表皮样癌、腺泡细胞癌和基底细胞腺癌与沃辛瘤无法区分(分别为P = 0.094、0.396和0.604)。
epiDWI有潜力将多形性腺瘤和肌上皮腺瘤与所有其他检查实体区分开来。由于不仅在良性和恶性病变组内存在重叠,而且在不同组之间也存在重叠,因此不应仅基于ADC值进行诊断。因此,进一步结合弥散加权成像(DWI)、形态学标准以及可能其他磁共振成像技术的研究似乎是必要的。