Barkmann Claus, Erhart Michael, Schulte-Markwort Michael
Centre for Obstetrics and Paediatrics, Department of Psychosomatics in Children and Adolescents, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, W29, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;17 Suppl 1:116-24. doi: 10.1007/s00787-008-1013-0.
To examine the psychometric properties and test the theoretical quality of the German version of the Centre for Epidemiological Studies depression scale for children (CES-DC), a 20-item screening instrument measuring the frequency of parent- and self-reported depressive symptoms in children and adolescents.
Using a population-based, representative sample of n=2,863 7 to 17-year-old German children and adolescents, factorial validity were determined by means of linear structural equation modelling. Cross-sectional coefficients of reliability, inter-rater agreement as well as descriptive statistics of the scales were calculated.
In a population-based German sample, the four-factor version of the CES-DC following Radloff (Appl Psychol Meas 1:385-401, 1977) is considered to have good factorial validity and stability across age and informant versions. The main problems of the questionnaire are the high item difficulties, strong floor effects of the scales and low cross-sectional reliability, which are acceptable only for screening purposes. The low inter-rater agreement indicates that parental assessment can replace self-assessment only to a limited degree.
The strengths and weaknesses of the CES-DC are discussed taking previous data and comparable tests into consideration. Particular advantages are the existence of the parent-report form and the adult version, as well as its multifactorial structure. Parental assessment should be supplemented by self-report data whenever possible.
检验儿童流行病学研究中心抑郁量表德文版(CES-DC)的心理测量特性,并测试其理论质量。该量表是一个包含20个条目的筛查工具,用于测量儿童和青少年中父母报告及自我报告的抑郁症状出现频率。
以n = 2863名7至17岁德国儿童和青少年为基于人群的代表性样本,通过线性结构方程模型确定因子效度。计算量表的横断面信度系数、评分者间一致性以及描述性统计量。
在基于德国人群的样本中,遵循拉德洛夫(Radloff,《应用心理测量》1:385 - 401,1977年)的CES-DC四因子版本在不同年龄和报告者版本中被认为具有良好的因子效度和稳定性。该问卷的主要问题是条目难度高、量表存在较强的地板效应以及横断面信度低,仅用于筛查目的时可接受。评分者间一致性低表明父母评估只能在有限程度上替代自我评估。
结合先前数据和可比测试讨论了CES-DC的优缺点。特别优点是存在父母报告表和成人版本,以及其多因素结构。只要有可能,父母评估应辅以自我报告数据。