Suppr超能文献

CHARISMA试验中的外周动脉疾病患者。

Patients with peripheral arterial disease in the CHARISMA trial.

作者信息

Cacoub Patrice P, Bhatt Deepak L, Steg P Gabriel, Topol Eric J, Creager Mark A

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP HP, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, F-75651 Paris Cedex 13, France.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2009 Jan;30(2):192-201. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn534. Epub 2009 Jan 9.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine whether clopidogrel plus aspirin provides greater protection against major cardiovascular events than aspirin alone in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a post hoc analysis of the 3096 patients with symptomatic (2838) or asymptomatic (258) PAD from the CHARISMA trial. The rate of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke (primary endpoint) was higher in patients with PAD than in those without PAD: 8.2% vs. 6.8% [hazard ratio (HR), 1.25; 95% CI 1.08, 1.44; P = 0.002]. Among the patients with PAD, the primary endpoint occurred in 7.6% in the clopidogrel plus aspirin group and 8.9% in the placebo plus aspirin group (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66-1.08; P = 0.18). In these patients, the rate of MI was lower in the dual antiplatelet arm than the aspirin alone arm: 2.3% vs. 3.7% (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.96; P = 0.029), as was the rate of hospitalization for ischaemic events: 16.5% vs. 20.1% (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.95; P = 0.011). The rates of severe, fatal, or moderate bleeding did not differ between the groups, whereas minor bleeding was increased with clopidogrel: 34.4% vs. 20.8% (odds ratio, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.69-2.34; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Dual therapy provided some benefit over aspirin alone in PAD patients for the rate of MI and the rate of hospitalization for ischaemic events, at the cost of an increase in minor bleeding.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在患有外周动脉疾病(PAD)的患者中,氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林是否比单独使用阿司匹林能提供更强的预防主要心血管事件的保护作用。

方法与结果

这是一项对CHARISMA试验中3096例有症状(2838例)或无症状(258例)PAD患者的事后分析。PAD患者中心血管死亡、心肌梗死(MI)或中风(主要终点)的发生率高于无PAD患者:8.2% 对比6.8% [风险比(HR),1.25;95%置信区间1.08,1.44;P = 0.002]。在PAD患者中,氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林组主要终点发生率为7.6%,安慰剂联合阿司匹林组为8.9%(HR,0.85;95%置信区间,0.66 - 1.08;P = 0.18)。在这些患者中,双联抗血小板治疗组的MI发生率低于单独使用阿司匹林组:2.3% 对比3.7%(HR,0.63;95%置信区间,0.42 - 0.96;P = 0.029),缺血事件住院率也是如此:16.5% 对比20.1%(HR,0.81;95%置信区间,0.68 - 0.95;P = 0.011)。两组之间严重、致命或中度出血的发生率没有差异,而氯吡格雷会增加轻微出血的发生率:34.4% 对比20.8%(优势比,1.99;95%置信区间,1.69 - 2.34;P < 0.001)。

结论

双联疗法在降低PAD患者的MI发生率和缺血事件住院率方面比单独使用阿司匹林有一定益处,但代价是轻微出血发生率增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验