Suppr超能文献

胰岛素泵与胰岛素注射疗法治疗1型糖尿病幼儿的随机前瞻性研究:12个月的血糖、体重指数和神经认知结果

A randomized prospective study of insulin pump vs. insulin injection therapy in very young children with type 1 diabetes: 12-month glycemic, BMI, and neurocognitive outcomes.

作者信息

Nabhan Zeina M, Kreher Nerissa C, Greene Dennis M, Eugster Erica A, Kronenberger William, DiMeglio Linda A

机构信息

Section of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Pediatrics, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 May;10(3):202-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00494.x. Epub 2008 Dec 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare glycemic control, body mass index (BMI), neurocognitive function, and parenting stress for preschool-aged diabetic children randomized to treatment either with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or with intensive insulin injection therapy (IIT).

METHODS

Children <5 yr of age diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus for at least 12 months were randomized to either CSII (n = 21) or IIT (n = 21) for 6 months. After 6 months, the IIT group began CSII therapy and the CSII group continued on pumps. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and BMI percent were collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Neurocognitive assessments (Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration and Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition) were administered to children, and parenting and child behavior assessments (Parenting Stress Index and Child Behavior Checklist) were completed by parents and at baseline, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-five children completed the study. Mean HbA1c decreased significantly over the study period (8.9% +/- 0.6 vs. 8.5% +/- 0.7, p = 0.006). Initiation of CSII resulted in an HbA1c decrease of 0.4% after 3 months (p = 0.002); however, in the CSII first group, the HbA1c at 12 months was not significantly different from study start (8.8% +/- 0.6 vs. 8.5% +/- 0.6; p = 0.4). There were no significant changes in BMI%, neurocognitive, parenting, and child behavior measures between groups.

CONCLUSION

Initiation of CSII vs. continuing IIT does not significantly influence HbA1c, BMI, neurocognitive, or parenting stress parameters in a research study setting.

摘要

目的

比较随机接受持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)或强化胰岛素注射治疗(IIT)的学龄前糖尿病儿童的血糖控制、体重指数(BMI)、神经认知功能和育儿压力。

方法

将诊断为1型糖尿病至少12个月的5岁以下儿童随机分为CSII组(n = 21)或IIT组(n = 21),为期6个月。6个月后,IIT组开始CSII治疗,CSII组继续使用胰岛素泵。在基线、3、6、9和12个月时收集糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和BMI百分比。对儿童进行神经认知评估(视觉运动整合发育测试和斯坦福-比奈智力量表:第四版),并由家长在基线、6和12个月时完成育儿和儿童行为评估(育儿压力指数和儿童行为清单)。

结果

35名儿童完成了研究。在研究期间,平均HbA1c显著下降(8.9%±0.6 vs. 8.5%±0.7,p = 0.006)。开始CSII治疗3个月后,HbA1c下降了0.4%(p = 0.002);然而,在CSII第一组中,12个月时的HbA1c与研究开始时无显著差异(8.8%±0.6 vs. 8.5%±0.6;p = 0.4)。两组之间的BMI百分比、神经认知、育儿和儿童行为指标无显著变化。

结论

在研究环境中,开始CSII治疗与继续IIT治疗对HbA1c、BMI、神经认知或育儿压力参数没有显著影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验