Suppr超能文献

吡美莫司乳膏与倍他米松治疗芥子气所致慢性皮肤损伤的临床疗效比较:一项随机、研究者盲法研究

Comparison of clinical efficacy of topical pimecrolimus with betamethasone in chronic skin lesions due to sulfur mustard exposure: a randomized, investigator-blind study.

作者信息

Panahi Yunes, Moharamzad Yashar, Beiraghdar Fatemeh, Naghizadeh Mohammad Mehdi

机构信息

Research Center of Chemical Injuries, Baqiyatallah Medical Sciences University, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2009 Feb;104(2):171-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2008.00356.x. Epub 2008 Dec 18.

Abstract

This study compared topical pimecrolimus with betamethasone in the treatment of pruritus and chronic skin lesions due to sulfur mustard exposure. Seventy male chemical-injured war veterans participated in this investigator-blinded clinical trial. They were randomized to receive pimecrolimus cream 1% (n = 35) or betamethasone cream 0.1% (n = 35) two times a day for 6 weeks. Dermatological examination and assessment of pruritus severity by a pruritic score questionnaire and visual analogue scale were done before and after the treatment course. A significant decrease (P < 0.05) in pruritus, burning sensation, and skin dryness was shown in both groups after the treatment. However, the severity of hyper- and hypopigmentation, vesicle, erythema, fissure, lichenification and excoriation did not decrease significantly in either group (P > 0.05). Mean (+/- standard deviation) pruritic scores at baseline for the pimecrolimus and betamethasone groups were 30.4 (+/- 8.0) and 33.6 (+/- 7.2), respectively (P = 0.103). These scores decreased to 18.8 (+/- 4.8) in the pimecrolimus and 20.8 (+/- 4.0) in the betamethasone groups after treatment; both showed a statistically significant decrease (P < 0.001). Change of pruritus score from baseline to after the treatment course was not statistically different between the two groups (P = 0.502). No serious side-effects were reported during the course of the treatment. Topical pimecrolimus 1% was as effective as betamethasone cream 0.1% in controlling pruritus, burning sensation and skin dryness of sulfur mustard-exposed patients.

摘要

本研究比较了外用吡美莫司与倍他米松治疗芥子气暴露所致瘙痒和慢性皮肤损伤的效果。70名男性化学伤退伍军人参与了这项研究者设盲的临床试验。他们被随机分为两组,一组每天两次接受1%吡美莫司乳膏治疗(n = 35),另一组每天两次接受0.1%倍他米松乳膏治疗(n = 35),疗程为6周。在治疗前后进行皮肤科检查,并通过瘙痒评分问卷和视觉模拟量表评估瘙痒严重程度。治疗后两组的瘙痒、烧灼感和皮肤干燥均有显著减轻(P < 0.05)。然而,两组的色素沉着过度和色素沉着不足、水疱、红斑、裂隙、苔藓化和擦伤的严重程度均未显著降低(P > 0.05)。吡美莫司组和倍他米松组基线时的平均(±标准差)瘙痒评分为30.4(±8.0)和33.6(±7.2),分别(P = 0.103)。治疗后,吡美莫司组和倍他米松组的这些评分分别降至18.8(±4.8)和20.8(±4.0);两组均显示出统计学上的显著降低(P < 0.001)。两组从基线到治疗后的瘙痒评分变化无统计学差异(P = 0.502)。治疗过程中未报告严重副作用。1%外用吡美莫司在控制芥子气暴露患者的瘙痒、烧灼感和皮肤干燥方面与0.1%倍他米松乳膏效果相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验