Medicaid coverage of circumcision spreads harm to the poor.
作者信息
Green Lawrence W, McAllister Ryan G, Peterson Kent W, Travis John W
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 2009 Apr;99(4):584; author reply 584-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.156463. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Medicaid coverage of circumcision spreads harm to the poor.医疗补助计划对包皮环切术的覆盖范围将伤害扩散至穷人。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Apr;99(4):584; author reply 584-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.156463. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
2
The medical benefits of male circumcision.男性包皮环切术的医学益处。
JAMA. 2011 Oct 5;306(13):1479-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1431.
3
Determinants and policy implications of male circumcision in the United States.美国男性包皮环切术的决定因素及政策影响
Am J Public Health. 2009 Jan;99(1):138-45. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.134403. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
4
Coverage of newborn and adult male circumcision varies among public and private US payers despite health benefits.尽管男性割礼具有健康益处，但美国公共和私人支付者对新生儿和成年男性割礼的覆盖范围存在差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Dec;30(12):2355-61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0776.
5
Decline in Frequency of Newborn Male Circumcision After Change in Medicaid Coverage Status in Selected States in the United States.美国部分州医疗补助覆盖范围变化后新生儿男性包皮环切术实施率的下降。
Public Health Rep. 2021 May;136(3):338-344. doi: 10.1177/0033354920971719. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
6
The 1982 Medicaid Funding Cessation for Circumcision in California and Circumcision Rates.1982年加利福尼亚州医疗补助停止对包皮环切术的资助与包皮环切率
AIDS Behav. 2023 May;27(5):1647-1652. doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03896-y. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
7
[Circumcision in male newborns--update].[男性新生儿包皮环切术——最新进展]
Harefuah. 2013 Mar;152(3):129-31, 184.
8
Benefits of male circumcision.男性包皮环切术的益处。
JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):456-7; author reply 457. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.62.
9
Benefits of male circumcision.男性包皮环切术的益处。
JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):456; author reply 457. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.61.
10
Benefits of male circumcision.男性包皮环切术的益处。
JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):455-6; author reply 457. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.60.
引用本文的文献
1
Neonatal Male Circumcision: Clearly Beneficial for Public Health or an Ethical Dilemma? A Systematic Review.新生儿男性包皮环切术：对公共卫生明显有益还是一个伦理困境？一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 23;16(2):e54772. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54772. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review.批判反对男性割礼观点的评估：系统综述。
J Evid Based Med. 2019 Nov;12(4):263-290. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12361. Epub 2019 Sep 8.
3
Review: a critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision for HIV prevention in developed countries.综述：对发达国家中反对男性包皮环切术预防艾滋病病毒的观点的批判性评估。
AIDS Care. 2012;24(12):1565-75. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.661836. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
4
Medicaid coverage of newborn circumcision: a health parity right of the poor.医疗补助对新生儿包皮环切术的覆盖：穷人的一项健康平等权利。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Jun;99(6):969-71. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.161281. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
本文引用的文献
1
Neonatal circumcision does not reduce HIV/AIDS infection rates.新生儿包皮环切术并不能降低艾滋病毒/艾滋病的感染率。
S Afr Med J. 2008 Oct;98(10):762-4, 766.
2
Determinants and policy implications of male circumcision in the United States.美国男性包皮环切术的决定因素及政策影响
Am J Public Health. 2009 Jan;99(1):138-45. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.134403. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
3
Is ritual circumcision a risk factor for neonatal urinary tract infections?仪式性包皮环切术是新生儿尿路感染的危险因素吗？
Arch Dis Child. 2009 Mar;94(3):191-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.144063. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
4
The possible role of circumcision in newborn outbreaks of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.包皮环切术在社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌新生儿暴发中的可能作用。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007 May;46(4):356-8. doi: 10.1177/0009922806294847.
5
A cost-utility analysis of neonatal circumcision.新生儿包皮环切术的成本效用分析。
Med Decis Making. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):584-601. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04271039.
6
Falling incidence of penis cancer in an uncircumcised population (Denmark 1943-90).未行包皮环切术人群（丹麦，1943 - 1990年）阴茎癌发病率的下降
BMJ. 1995 Dec 2;311(7018):1471. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7018.1471.
7
Complications of circumcision.包皮环切术的并发症。
Br J Surg. 1993 Oct;80(10):1231-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801005.
Zotero 插件