Women's Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway.
Midwifery. 2010 Dec;26(6):e25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.11.005. Epub 2009 Jan 18.
to explore Norwegian nulliparous women's experiences of communication and contact with midwives at the labour ward in the early phase of labour.
a qualitative study based on in-depth interviews.
17 women expecting their first baby.
four themes that emerged in the collected material seem to be central to how the labouring women decided to make contact with the labour ward and how they experienced this contact with the staff: (a) negotiating on two fronts, (b) avoiding being sent home, (c) searching for regularity, and (d) experiencing vulnerability.
the study shows how women in labour for the first time negotiate their credibility with midwives through the requisite pattern of regularity, and also shows their vulnerability in attempting to avoid being sent home from hospital because it is 'too soon' to be admitted. It also argues that the midwifery profession is ambivalent about the paradigm to which it conforms in its contact with women in early labour.
the findings of this study show that the way in which questions are asked in this phase is very important. Midwives should be aware that if they only ask the 'standard question' related to the pattern of contraction regularity, they might lose vital information and also deprive the woman of the chance to verbalise her experiences and her needs as she perceives them. If the focus is shifted from the rigid instructions that women are given to an emphasis on the women's actual experiences, the need for negotiation will probably diminish. The task of assessing and evaluating women in early labour need not necessarily be performed inside the ordinary labour ward, but may be done in a more home-like environment outside the hospital or in the woman's home.
探讨挪威初产妇在分娩早期与产房助产士沟通和联系的体验。
基于深度访谈的定性研究。
17 名期待生育第一胎的妇女。
从收集的资料中出现了四个主题,似乎是决定产妇决定与产房联系以及她们如何体验与工作人员联系的核心:(a)两面协商,(b)避免被送回家,(c)寻找规律性,和(d)体验脆弱性。
该研究表明,初产妇在分娩时如何通过规律性的必要模式来与助产士协商自己的可信度,同时也表明她们试图避免因“太早”而被从医院送回家的脆弱性。它还认为,助产士职业对其在早期分娩接触妇女时所遵循的范式存在矛盾。
本研究的结果表明,在这一阶段提出问题的方式非常重要。助产士应该意识到,如果他们只问与收缩规律性模式相关的“标准问题”,他们可能会失去重要信息,也剥夺了妇女表达自己经历和需求的机会,因为这是她所感知到的。如果将重点从给妇女的严格指示转移到对妇女实际经历的强调,那么协商的必要性可能会降低。评估和评估早期分娩妇女的任务不一定必须在普通产房内进行,而可以在医院外或妇女家中的更居家环境中进行。