Starcke Jan Hendrik, Wormit Michael, Dreuw Andreas
Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Max von Laue-Str. 7, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
J Chem Phys. 2009 Jan 14;130(2):024104. doi: 10.1063/1.3048877.
An unrestricted version of the algebraic diagrammatic construction (ADC) scheme of the polarization propagator in second order perturbation theory [UADC(2)] is derived via the intermediate state representation. The accuracy of the extended UADC(2)-x approach is evaluated by comparison of computed excitation energies of 11 medium-sized radicals with their corresponding experimental literature values and with excitation energies computed at equation-of-motion-CCSD (coupled clusters singles and doubles) level of theory. Overall, our numerical tests show that UADC(2)-x exhibits an averaged mean deviation in the excitation energies of only 0.3-0.4 eV compared to experimental gas phase data. It provides thus an alternative to coupled-cluster based approaches for the calculation of excited states of medium-sized open-shell molecules.
通过中间态表示法推导了二阶微扰理论中极化传播子的代数图解构造(ADC)方案的无限制版本[UADC(2)]。通过将11个中等大小自由基的计算激发能与其相应的实验文献值以及在运动方程耦合簇单双激发(EOM-CCSD)理论水平下计算的激发能进行比较,评估了扩展的UADC(2)-x方法的准确性。总体而言,我们的数值测试表明,与实验气相数据相比,UADC(2)-x在激发能方面的平均平均偏差仅为0.3-0.4 eV。因此,它为基于耦合簇的方法提供了一种替代方案,用于计算中等大小开壳分子的激发态。