Yu Z X, Sekiguchi M, Nunoda S, Hiroe M, Hosoda S
Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women's Medical College, Japan.
Eur Heart J. 1991 Aug;12 Suppl D:13-7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/12.suppl_d.13.
In order to determine the presence or absence of myocarditis in cases with viral or idiopathic pericarditis, a study was conducted as one of our series on endomyocardial biopsy. There were two groups of patients, pericarditis cases (n = 8), and patients with perimyocarditis (n = 6). In the former group, it was confirmed that cardiac sarcoplasmic enzymes were not released during the acute stage of the disease. In the latter, there was positive evidence of the enzyme release. Also, employing our method of categorizing the possibility of myocarditis at the histopathological level, we found that the category 'highly suggestive' of myocarditis was absent in all eight cases with pericarditis. However, in cases with perimyocarditis, this category was assigned in four out of six cases (67%), indicating a high incidence. The category, 'slightly suggestive', was seen in three cases of the former (38%) and two cases of the latter group (33%). It is concluded that in patients with pericarditis, the release of cardiac sarcoplasmic enzyme is an important diagnostic element in the diagnosis of perimyocarditis even if the clinical features reveal a predominance of pericarditis. In patients with perimyocarditis, progression to residual cardiac disease, such as conduction disturbance or congestive heart failure, is likely.
为了确定病毒性或特发性心包炎病例中是否存在心肌炎,我们开展了一项心内膜心肌活检系列研究。患者分为两组,心包炎患者(n = 8)和心肌心包炎患者(n = 6)。在前一组中,已证实在疾病急性期心肌肌浆酶未释放。在后一组中,有酶释放的阳性证据。此外,采用我们在组织病理学水平对心肌炎可能性进行分类的方法,我们发现所有8例心包炎病例中均不存在“高度提示”心肌炎的类别。然而,在心肌心包炎病例中,6例中有4例(67%)被归为此类别,表明发病率较高。“轻度提示”类别在前一组3例(38%)和后一组2例(33%)中可见。结论是,在心包炎患者中,即使临床特征显示以心包炎为主,心肌肌浆酶的释放仍是诊断心肌心包炎的重要诊断依据。在心肌心包炎患者中,进展为残留心脏疾病如传导障碍或充血性心力衰竭的可能性较大。