Suppr超能文献

这位患者有胸腔积液吗?

Does this patient have a pleural effusion?

作者信息

Wong Camilla L, Holroyd-Leduc Jayna, Straus Sharon E

机构信息

Division of Geriatrics, University of Toronto, and St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA. 2009 Jan 21;301(3):309-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.937.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Pleural effusion is a common finding among patients presenting with respiratory symptoms. The value of the bedside examination to detect pleural effusion is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the evidence regarding the accuracy of the physical examination in assessing the probability of a pleural effusion.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE (1950-October 2008) and EMBASE (1980-October 2008) using Ovid to identify English-language studies conducted in a clinical setting. Additional studies were identified by searching the bibliographies of retrieved articles and contacting experts in the field.

STUDY SELECTION

We included prospective studies of diagnostic accuracy that compared at least 1 physical examination maneuver with radiographic confirmation of pleural effusion.

DATA EXTRACTION

Three authors independently appraised study quality and extracted relevant data. Data regarding participant recruitment, reference standard, diagnostic test(s), and test accuracy were extracted. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We identified 310 unique citations, but only 5 prospectively conducted studies met inclusion criteria (N = 934 patients). A random-effects model was used for quantitative synthesis. Of the 8 physical examination maneuvers evaluated in the included studies (conventional percussion, auscultatory percussion, breath sounds, chest expansion, tactile vocal fremitus, vocal resonance, crackles, and pleural friction rub), dullness to conventional percussion was most accurate for diagnosing pleural effusion (summary positive likelihood ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-33.8), while the absence of reduced tactile vocal fremitus made pleural effusion less likely (negative likelihood ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the limited number of studies, dullness to percussion and tactile fremitus are the most useful findings for pleural effusion. Dull chest percussion makes the probability of a pleural effusion much more likely but requires a chest radiograph to confirm the diagnosis. When the pretest probability of pleural effusion is low, the absence of reduced tactile vocal fremitus makes pleural effusion less likely so that a chest radiograph might not be necessary depending on the overall clinical situation.

摘要

背景

胸腔积液是有呼吸系统症状患者中的常见表现。床旁检查对检测胸腔积液的价值尚不清楚。

目的

系统评价体格检查在评估胸腔积液可能性方面准确性的证据。

数据来源

我们使用Ovid检索了MEDLINE(1950年至2008年10月)和EMBASE(1980年至2008年10月),以识别在临床环境中进行的英文研究。通过检索检索文章的参考文献并联系该领域的专家来识别其他研究。

研究选择

我们纳入了诊断准确性的前瞻性研究,这些研究将至少一种体格检查手法与胸腔积液的影像学确认进行了比较。

数据提取

三位作者独立评估研究质量并提取相关数据。提取了有关参与者招募、参考标准、诊断测试和测试准确性的数据。分歧通过共识解决。

数据综合

我们识别出310条独特的引文,但只有5项前瞻性研究符合纳入标准(N = 934例患者)。采用随机效应模型进行定量综合。在所纳入研究中评估的8种体格检查手法(传统叩诊、听诊叩诊、呼吸音、胸廓扩张、触觉语颤、语音共振、啰音和胸膜摩擦音)中,传统叩诊出现浊音对诊断胸腔积液最准确(汇总阳性似然比,8.7;95%置信区间,2.2 - 33.8),而触觉语颤未减弱则使胸腔积液的可能性降低(阴性似然比,0.21;95%置信区间,0.12 - 0.37)。

结论

基于有限数量的研究,叩诊浊音和触觉语颤是胸腔积液最有用的体征。胸部叩诊出现浊音使胸腔积液的可能性大大增加,但需要胸部X线片来确诊。当胸腔积液的预检概率较低时,触觉语颤未减弱使胸腔积液的可能性降低,因此根据整体临床情况可能无需进行胸部X线片检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验