Chan John Y C, Leyk Malgorzata, Frier Brian M, Tan Meng H
Eli Lilly Canada Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009 Mar;25(3):224-31. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.929.
To examine the relationship between glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin (Met) and either insulin lispro mixtures, given twice or thrice daily (LM + Met), or insulin glargine, given once daily (G + Met).
Data from three randomized clinical trials were pooled to compare effects of LM + Met with G + Met.
The LM + Met group achieved lower mean HbA(1c) (mean+/-SE, 7.2+/-0.1 vs. 7.7+/-0.1%, p<0.0001) and all meals combined post-prandial blood glucose (BG) (8.9+/-0.1 vs. 10.2+/-0.1 mmol/L, p<0.0001) compared with the G + Met group, but had higher fasting blood glucose (8.1+/-0.1 vs. 6.8+/-0.1 mmol/L, p<0.0001) and insulin requirement (0.7+/-0.01 vs. 0.6+/-0.01 U/kg, p<0.0001). Over the entire study period, daytime hypoglycaemia was higher for the LM + Met group (10.3 vs. 3.5 episodes/patient/year, p<0.0001) than for the G + Met group; however, nocturnal hypoglycaemia was lower (3.4 vs. 6.6 episodes/patient/year, p=0.003). At endpoint, daytime hypoglycaemia was higher for the LM + Met group (6.2 vs. 1.4 episodes/patient/year, p<0.0001); however, nocturnal hypoglycaemia was similar in both groups (1.9 vs. 3.0 episodes/patient/year). An inverse relationship was observed between all confirmed hypoglycaemia and HbA(1c) at endpoint; for every 1% reduction in HbA(1c), the increase (in slope) was 1.4 episodes/patient/year (p=0.04). Patients with confirmed hypoglycaemia had lower HbA(1c) than patients without hypoglycaemia (7.39 vs. 7.64%, respectively; decrement=0.26%, p=0.026).
These studies demonstrated an inverse relationship between HbA(1c) and 24-h and daytime hypoglycaemia. Lispro insulin mixtures provided lower HbA(1c) and post-prandial blood glucose values than glargine, but caused more daytime hypoglycaemia. Frequency of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was similar and severe hypoglycaemia was rare with both insulin regimens.
探讨接受二甲双胍(Met)治疗的2型糖尿病患者,联合一日两次或三次注射赖脯胰岛素混合制剂(LM + Met)或一日一次注射甘精胰岛素(G + Met)时,血糖控制与低血糖之间的关系。
汇总三项随机临床试验的数据,比较LM + Met与G + Met的效果。
与G + Met组相比,LM + Met组的平均糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平更低(均值±标准误,7.2±0.1 vs. 7.7±0.1%,p<0.0001),三餐合并后的餐后血糖(BG)也更低(8.9±0.1 vs. 10.2±0.1 mmol/L,p<0.0001),但空腹血糖更高(8.1±0.1 vs. 6.8±0.1 mmol/L,p<0.0001),胰岛素需求量也更大(0.7±0.01 vs. 0.6±0.01 U/kg,p<0.0001)。在整个研究期间,LM + Met组的日间低血糖发生率高于G + Met组(10.3 vs. 3.5次/患者/年,p<0.0001);然而,夜间低血糖发生率更低(3.4 vs. 6.6次/患者/年,p = 0.003)。在研究终点,LM + Met组的日间低血糖发生率更高(6.2 vs. 1.4次/患者/年,p<0.0001);然而,两组的夜间低血糖发生率相似(1.9 vs. 3.0次/患者/年)。在研究终点,所有确诊的低血糖事件与HbA1c之间呈负相关;HbA1c每降低1%,(斜率)增加1.4次/患者/年(p = 0.04)。确诊低血糖的患者HbA1c低于未发生低血糖的患者(分别为7.39%和7.64%;差值 = 0.26%,p = 0.026)。
这些研究表明HbA1c与24小时及日间低血糖之间呈负相关。赖脯胰岛素混合制剂比甘精胰岛素能提供更低的HbA1c和餐后血糖值,但会导致更多的日间低血糖。两种胰岛素治疗方案的夜间低血糖发生率相似,严重低血糖罕见。