Dickmann Anna, Petroni Sergio, Salerni Annabella, Dell'Omo Roberto, Balestrazzi Emilio
Institute of Ophthalmology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
J AAPOS. 2009 Apr;13(2):148-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.10.009. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
To determine whether retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), macular thickness (MT), and foveal volume (FV) in patients with unilateral amblyopia differ between the amblyopic and the sound eye.
A Humphrey-Zeiss Stratus (OCT3) with software 4.0.3.1 was used to evaluate 40 patients (17 male, 23 female; mean age, 15.2 years; range, 5-56 years) with unilateral amblyopia. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 20 strabismic and 20 anisometropic. Maps of macular thickness and RNFL thickness (3.46) created by the use of optical coherence tomography were applied to calculate FV and MT and RNFLT.
Mean best-corrected visual acuity was +0.3 LogMAR (range, +0.2 to +1.0) in the amblyopic eye. Mean RNFL thickness was not significantly different between eyes in either group. In strabismic amblyopia, mean MT and FV were 5% lower in the sound eye than in the amblyopic eye (MT, 267 microm vs 253 microm, p = 0.005; FV, 2.57 mm(3) vs 2.43 mm(3), p = 0.001). In anisometropic amblyopia, there was no significant difference between eyes in either MT or FV.
In patients with strabismic amblyopia, the MT and FV were slightly but significantly lower in the sound eye than in the amblyopic eye. The clinical importance of this difference is not known. No such difference was observed in patients with anisometropic amblyopia.
确定单侧弱视患者患眼与健眼中视网膜神经纤维层厚度(RNFLT)、黄斑厚度(MT)和中心凹体积(FV)是否存在差异。
使用配备4.0.3.1软件的Humphrey-Zeiss Stratus(OCT3)对40例单侧弱视患者(17例男性,23例女性;平均年龄15.2岁;范围5 - 56岁)进行评估。患者分为2组:20例斜视性弱视患者和20例屈光参差性弱视患者。利用光学相干断层扫描生成的黄斑厚度图和RNFL厚度图(3.46)来计算FV、MT和RNFLT。
弱视眼的平均最佳矫正视力为+0.3 LogMAR(范围,+0.2至+1.0)。两组患者的患眼与健眼之间,平均RNFL厚度均无显著差异。在斜视性弱视患者中,健眼中的平均MT和FV比弱视眼低5%(MT,267微米对253微米,p = 0.005;FV,2.57立方毫米对2.43立方毫米,p = 0.001)。在屈光参差性弱视患者中,患眼与健眼在MT或FV方面均无显著差异。
在斜视性弱视患者中,健眼中的MT和FV略低于弱视眼,但差异具有统计学意义。这种差异的临床重要性尚不清楚。在屈光参差性弱视患者中未观察到此类差异。