Ranaboldo C, Davies J, Chant A
Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton, U.K.
Eur J Vasc Surg. 1991 Aug;5(4):415-9. doi: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80173-2.
The role of duplex scanning and arteriography as a means of assessing patients for carotid endarterectomy has been reviewed for the period 1984 to 1988 when 98 carotid endarterectomies were performed. Of these 44 were selected for surgery on the basis of duplex assessment alone, 48 after carotid angiography and duplex scanning and six after angiography alone. No difference between the groups of patients was observed for either perioperative or follow-up complication rates, although all late deaths occurred in patients who had been examined by angiography. By the end of the study period angiography was requested for less than 30% of all patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. It is argued that the change in our practice is safe provided that certain criteria are met. These include angiography in cases of suspected aortic arch or proximal vessel disease and in those symptomatic patients with a duplex diagnosis of complete occlusion.
1984年至1988年期间,共进行了98例颈动脉内膜切除术,在此期间对双功超声扫描和动脉造影作为评估患者是否适合进行颈动脉内膜切除术的手段进行了回顾。其中,44例仅根据双功超声评估选择进行手术,48例在颈动脉血管造影和双功超声扫描后进行手术,6例仅在血管造影后进行手术。尽管所有晚期死亡病例均发生在接受血管造影检查的患者中,但各患者组的围手术期或随访并发症发生率均无差异。到研究期结束时,接受颈动脉内膜切除术的所有患者中,要求进行血管造影的不到30%。有人认为,只要满足某些标准,我们在实践中的这种改变是安全的。这些标准包括在怀疑有主动脉弓或近端血管疾病的病例中以及在双功超声诊断为完全闭塞的有症状患者中进行血管造影。