并非所有尽责性量表的变化都是一样的：一项关于尽责性各方面年龄差异的多方法、多样本研究。
Not all conscientiousness scales change alike: a multimethod, multisample study of age differences in the facets of conscientiousness.
作者信息
Jackson Joshua J, Bogg Tim, Walton Kate E, Wood Dustin, Harms Peter D, Lodi-Smith Jennifer, Edmonds Grant W, Roberts Brent W
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
出版信息
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Feb;96(2):446-59. doi: 10.1037/a0014156.
Abstract
Previous research has shown that traits from the domain of conscientiousness tend to increase with age. However, previous research has not tested whether all aspects of conscientiousness change with age. The present research tests age differences in multiple facets of conscientiousness (industriousness, orderliness, impulse control, reliability, and conventionality) using multiple methods and multiple samples. In a community sample (N = 274) and a representative statewide sample (N = 613) of 18- to 94-year-olds, self-reported industriousness, impulse control, and reliability showed age differences from early adulthood to middle age, whereas orderliness did not. The transition into late adulthood was characterized by increases in impulse control, reliability, and conventionality. In contrast, age differences in observer-rated personality occurred mainly in older adulthood. Age differences held across both ethnicity and levels of socioeconomic status.
摘要
先前的研究表明，尽责性领域的特质往往会随着年龄的增长而增加。然而，先前的研究并未测试尽责性的所有方面是否会随年龄变化。本研究使用多种方法和多个样本，测试了尽责性多个方面（勤奋、有序、冲动控制、可靠性和守旧性）的年龄差异。在一个由18至94岁人群组成的社区样本（N = 274）和一个具有代表性的全州样本（N = 613）中，自我报告的勤奋、冲动控制和可靠性从成年早期到中年呈现出年龄差异，而有序性则没有。进入成年晚期的特征是冲动控制、可靠性和守旧性的增加。相比之下，观察者评定的人格的年龄差异主要出现在老年期。年龄差异在不同种族和社会经济地位水平上均存在。
相似文献
1
Not all conscientiousness scales change alike: a multimethod, multisample study of age differences in the facets of conscientiousness.并非所有尽责性量表的变化都是一样的：一项关于尽责性各方面年龄差异的多方法、多样本研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Feb;96(2):446-59. doi: 10.1037/a0014156.
2
Perceived social support predicts increased conscientiousness during older adulthood.感知到的社会支持预示着成年后期尽责性的增强。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 Jul;69(4):543-7. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt024. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
3
The Chernyshenko Conscientiousness Scales: A New Facet Measure of Conscientiousness.切尔尼申科尽责性量表：尽责性的一种新的层面测量方法。
Assessment. 2016 Jun;23(3):374-85. doi: 10.1177/1073191115580639. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
4
Conscientiousness, the transtheoretical model of change, and exercise: a neo-socioanalytic integration of trait and social-cognitive frameworks in the prediction of behavior.尽责性、行为改变的跨理论模型与锻炼：特质和社会认知框架在行为预测中的新社会分析整合
J Pers. 2008 Jul;76(4):775-802. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00504.x. Epub 2008 May 12.
5
The effect of response style on self-reported Conscientiousness across 20 countries.20 个国家中反应风格对自我报告的责任心的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Nov;38(11):1423-36. doi: 10.1177/0146167212451275. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
6
Facets of conscientiousness and longevity: Findings from the Health and Retirement Study.尽责性的多个方面及其与长寿的关联：来自健康与退休研究的数据。
J Psychosom Res. 2019 Jan;116:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
7
Developing and Validating a Short-Form Questionnaire for the Assessment of Seven Facets of Conscientiousness in Large-Scale Assessments.开发并验证一种简短问卷，用于大规模评估中对责任心的七个方面进行评估。
J Pers Assess. 2022 Nov-Dec;104(6):759-773. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1998083. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
8
Refining the maturity principle of personality development by examining facets, close others, and comaturation.通过考察人格发展的各个方面、亲近他人和共同成长来完善成熟原则。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 May;122(5):942-958. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000400. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
9
Facets of conscientiousness and objective markers of health status.尽责性的各个方面和健康状况的客观标志物。
Psychol Health. 2018 Sep;33(9):1100-1115. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1464165. Epub 2018 May 2.
10
Conscientiousness mediates the relation between perceived parental socialisation and self-rated health.尽责性在感知到的父母社会化与自我评估健康之间起中介作用。
Psychol Health. 2012;27(9):1048-61. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.652110. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
引用本文的文献
1
Development and validation of a personal responsibility scale for Chinese college students.中国大学生个人责任量表的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 16;14:1231462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1231462. eCollection 2023.
2
Age differences in routine formation: the role of automatization, motivation, and executive functions.常规形成中的年龄差异：自动化、动机和执行功能的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 6;14:1140366. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1140366. eCollection 2023.
3
Self-control in old age: A grounded theory study.老年期的自我控制：一项扎根理论研究。
Belitung Nurs J. 2021 Jun 28;7(3):151-162. doi: 10.33546/bnj.1412. eCollection 2021.
4
Trait and facet personality similarity and relationship and life satisfaction in romantic couples.浪漫情侣的特质与层面人格相似性、关系及生活满意度
J Res Pers. 2023 Jun;104. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104378. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
5
Age and gender differences in narcissism: A comprehensive study across eight measures and over 250,000 participants.年龄和性别差异中的自恋：八项测量和超过 25 万名参与者的综合研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Jun;124(6):1277-1298. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000463.
6
Wakeful Rest Benefits Recall, but Not Recognition, of Incidentally Encoded Memory Stimuli in Younger and Older Adults.清醒休息对年轻人和老年人偶然编码的记忆刺激的回忆有益，但对识别无益。
Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 24;12(12):1609. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121609.
7
The effects of socioeconomic status on personality development in adulthood and aging.社会经济地位对成年人和老年期人格发展的影响。
J Pers. 2024 Feb;92(1):243-260. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12801. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
8
Personalized Prediction of Behaviors and Experiences: An Idiographic Person-Situation Test.个性化预测行为和体验：一种个体化的人-情境测试。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Oct;33(10):1767-1782. doi: 10.1177/09567976221093307. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
9
A mega-analysis of personality prediction: Robustness and boundary conditions.人格预测的荟萃分析：稳健性和边界条件。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Mar;122(3):523-553. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000386.
10
Using a Thin Slice Coding Approach to Assess Preschool Personality Dimensions.运用薄片编码法评估学前儿童的人格维度。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):214-223. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1722140. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
本文引用的文献
1
Replication and p Intervals: p Values Predict the Future Only Vaguely, but Confidence Intervals Do Much Better.复制和 p 值区间：p 值只能模糊地预测未来，但置信区间要好得多。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jul;3(4):286-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00079.x.
2
The Power of Personality: The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcomes.人格的力量：人格特质、社会经济地位和认知能力在预测重要人生结果方面的比较效度
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):313-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.
3
Personality trait level and change as predictors of health outcomes: findings from a national study of Americans (MIDUS).人格特质水平及其变化对健康结果的预测作用：来自美国全国性研究（MIDUS）的发现。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2012 Jan;67(1):4-12. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr072. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
4
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
5
Sociogenomic personality psychology.社会基因组人格心理学
J Pers. 2008 Dec;76(6):1523-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00530.x.
6
Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five.大五人格高阶因素中的实质与特质
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Aug;95(2):442-55. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.442.
7
Social investment and personality: a meta-analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism.社会投资与人格：人格特质与工作、家庭、宗教及志愿服务投资关系的元分析
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 Feb;11(1):68-86. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294590.
8
Personality change influences mortality in older men.人格变化影响老年男性的死亡率。
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):371-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01907.x.
9
Gene-environment correlations: a review of the evidence and implications for prevention of mental illness.基因-环境相关性：预防精神疾病的证据综述及意义
Mol Psychiatry. 2007 May;12(5):432-42. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001950. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
10
Cross-sectional age differences and longitudinal age changes of personality in middle adulthood and old age.中年和老年期人格的横断面年龄差异及纵向年龄变化
J Pers. 2007 Apr;75(2):323-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00441.x.
Zotero 插件