Seed Amanda M, Call Josep, Emery Nathan J, Clayton Nicola S
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, UK.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Jan;35(1):23-34. doi: 10.1037/a0012925.
The trap-tube problem is difficult for chimpanzees to solve; in several studies only 1 to 2 subjects learn the solution. The authors tested eight chimpanzees on a non-tool-using version of the problem to investigate whether the inclusion of a tool in previous tests of the trap problem may have masked the ability of chimpanzees to solve it. All eight learned to avoid the trap, in 40 to 100 trials. One transferred to two tasks that had no visual cue in common. The authors examined the performance of 15 chimpanzees on a new task in a 2 x 2 design: seven had experience on the two-trap box, eight had not; half of each group was tested with a tool, half without one. An ANOVA revealed a significant effect of tool-inclusion and experience (p < .05). Our results show that including a tool in the trap problem profoundly affects the ability of chimpanzees to solve it. With regard to what the chimpanzees had learned, the results support the notion that rather than using the available stimuli as arbitrary cues, the subjects had encoded information about functional properties.
陷阱管问题对黑猩猩来说很难解决;在几项研究中,只有1到2只受试动物学会了解决方法。作者们在该问题的一个不使用工具的版本上测试了8只黑猩猩,以调查在之前的陷阱问题测试中加入工具是否可能掩盖了黑猩猩解决该问题的能力。所有8只黑猩猩在40到100次试验中都学会了避开陷阱。其中一只转移到了两个没有共同视觉线索的任务中。作者们在一个2×2设计的新任务上检查了15只黑猩猩的表现:7只曾有过双陷阱箱的经验,8只没有;每组各有一半用工具进行测试,另一半不用工具。方差分析显示加入工具和经验有显著影响(p < .05)。我们的结果表明,在陷阱问题中加入工具会深刻影响黑猩猩解决它的能力。关于黑猩猩学到了什么,结果支持了这样一种观点,即受试动物不是将可用刺激作为任意线索,而是对功能特性的信息进行了编码。