Voineskos Aristotle N, O'Donnell Lauren J, Lobaugh Nancy J, Markant Doug, Ameis Stephanie H, Niethammer Marc, Mulsant Benoit H, Pollock Bruce G, Kennedy James L, Westin Carl Fredrik, Shenton Martha E
Geriatric Mental Health Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada.
Neuroimage. 2009 Apr 1;45(2):370-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.028. Epub 2008 Dec 29.
MR diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can measure and visualize organization of white matter fibre tracts in vivo. DTI is a relatively new imaging technique, and new tools developed for quantifying fibre tracts require evaluation. The purpose of this study was to compare the reliability of a novel clustering approach with a multiple region of interest (MROI) approach in both healthy and disease (schizophrenia) populations. DTI images were acquired in 20 participants (n=10 patients with schizophrenia: 56+/-15 years; n=10 controls: 51+/-20 years) (1.5 T GE system) with diffusion gradients applied in 23 non-collinear directions, repeated three times. Whole brain seeding and creation of fibre tracts were then performed. Interrater reliability of the clustering approach, and the MROI approach, were each evaluated and the methods compared. There was high spatial (voxel-based) agreement within and between the clustering and MROI methods. Fractional anisotropy, trace, and radial and axial diffusivity values showed high intraclass correlation (p<0.001 for all tracts) for each approach. Differences in scalar indices of diffusion between the clustering and MROI approach were minimal. The excellent interrater reliability of the clustering method and high agreement with the MROI method, quantitatively and spatially, indicates that the clustering method can be used with confidence. The clustering method avoids biases of ROI drawing and placement, and, not limited by a priori predictions, may be a more robust and efficient way to identify and measure white matter tracts of interest.
磁共振扩散张量成像(DTI)能够在活体中测量并可视化白质纤维束的组织结构。DTI是一种相对较新的成像技术,为量化纤维束而开发的新工具需要进行评估。本研究的目的是比较一种新型聚类方法与多感兴趣区域(MROI)方法在健康人群和疾病(精神分裂症)人群中的可靠性。对20名参与者(n = 10名精神分裂症患者:56±15岁;n = 10名对照:51±20岁)进行DTI图像采集(1.5T通用电气系统),扩散梯度应用于23个非共线方向,重复三次。然后进行全脑种子点设置和纤维束创建。分别评估聚类方法和MROI方法的评分者间可靠性,并对两种方法进行比较。聚类方法与MROI方法在内部和之间均有较高的空间(基于体素)一致性。各方法的分数各向异性、迹线以及径向和轴向扩散率值均显示出较高的组内相关性(所有纤维束p<0.001)。聚类方法与MROI方法之间扩散标量指数的差异极小。聚类方法出色的评分者间可靠性以及在定量和空间上与MROI方法的高度一致性表明,聚类方法可以放心使用。聚类方法避免了ROI绘制和放置的偏差,并且不受先验预测的限制,可能是一种更稳健、更有效的方法来识别和测量感兴趣的白质束。