Knebel P, Fischer L, Huesing J, Hennes R, Büchler M W, Seiler C M
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Br J Surg. 2009 Feb;96(2):159-65. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6457.
Totally implantable access ports (TIAPs) are often used for patients who need permanent venous access. The primary success rate using direct open insertion is about 80 per cent, so rescue strategies are needed. This study compared the primary success rates of standard open insertion and a modified Seldinger technique.
This randomized trial recruited 164 patients scheduled for primary implantation of a TIAP and compared two interventions. The primary endpoint was the success rate of the implantation technique.
The primary success rates were similar: 66 (80 per cent) of 82 patients who had standard open insertion versus 69 (84 per cent) of 82 patients undergoing the modified Seldinger method (P = 0.686). A logistic mixed regression analysis including treatment group, age, Karnofsky index, body mass index and surgeon's experience showed no advantage for the Seldinger method: odds ratio 1.30 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.62 to 2.70). TIAPs were eventually implanted successfully in 163 (99.4 per cent) of 164 patients. In 11 patients randomized to standard surgery, the Seldinger method was a successful rescue strategy.
The primary success rate was similar for both open insertion methods. The modified Seldinger method is useful if standard open insertion fails.
ISRCTN 52368201 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).
完全植入式接入端口(TIAPs)常用于需要长期静脉通路的患者。直接开放插入的一次成功率约为80%,因此需要抢救策略。本研究比较了标准开放插入和改良Seldinger技术的一次成功率。
这项随机试验招募了164例计划首次植入TIAP的患者,并比较了两种干预措施。主要终点是植入技术的成功率。
一次成功率相似:82例行标准开放插入的患者中有66例(80%)成功,而82例行改良Seldinger方法的患者中有69例(84%)成功(P = 0.686)。一项包括治疗组、年龄、卡诺夫斯基指数、体重指数和外科医生经验的逻辑混合回归分析显示,Seldinger方法并无优势:优势比为1.30(95%置信区间为0.62至2.70)。164例患者中有163例(99.4%)最终成功植入TIAP。在随机分配接受标准手术的11例患者中,Seldinger方法是一种成功的抢救策略。
两种开放插入方法的一次成功率相似。如果标准开放插入失败,改良Seldinger方法是有用的。
ISRCTN 52368201(http://www.controlled-trials.com)