Cernelc S, Vozelj M
Glas Srp Akad Nauka Med. 1991(41):1-10.
Authors point out the morbidity of employees working in ventilation systems contaminated with various microorganisms. They analysed 96 workers exposed to air conditioning system (Group A), and 71 workers (Group B) breathing normal ambient air. The workers of both groups were subjected clinically by functionally and immunologically. Preparation of antigens "MMM" (Monday morning miseries) was used as an original method by Ajello et al. for producing antigens from systemic mycotic agents and subsequently modified. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the possibility of using ELISA in clinical practice for respiratory allergy diagnosis, and especially Hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Atopic status was determined by skin prick tests with common airborne allergens including Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, ragweed, grasses and Aspergillus fumigatus., by Enzygnost--IgE (Behringwerke AG, Marburg) and for specific IgE by RAST technique (Pharmacia, Uppsala). The skin prick tests were performed with "MMM"-antigens. PEFR (Peak Expiratory Flow-Rate) was measured by using a Wright's peak flow meter. PEFR was recorded on Monday (first day at work) and Friday (the end of the working week). Measured values of PEFR in both groups of employees from Monday to Friday were elaborated by the Wilcoxon test.
Culture of scrapings from air conditioning vents were obtained and water from the humidifier system also cultured. They were grown: T. vulgaris, Aspergillus fumigatus, Thermoactinomyces vulgaris and others. Results of questionnaires, clinical evaluation and diagnostical procedures in employees of Group A and B are as follows: Thirty eight workers in Group A had a positive clinical history of "Monday illness". In the symptomatic Group A we found in 8 cases abnormal chest roentgenogram. Further, there was no correlation between the presence of antibodies (ELISA) against MMM and pulmonary function abnormalities, as measured by either spirometry or DLCO. Further, we found good agreement between ELISA and prick test results with antigen MMM. Wilcoxon test showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (0.01). The median or central value of PEFR reduction in Group A is 10.23 per cent, and in Group B 1.49 per cent. A 30 per cent reduction of PEFR was observed in 5.21 per cent of subjects in Group A. Exposure to ventilation systems contaminated with Thermophilic actinomyces may be responsible for increased morbidity and reduced performance of employees working in air conditioning systems. Particularly the main filter should be checked regularly. Moreover, regular microbiologic examinations of dust and water from air preventing chronic obstructive lung diseases in employees working in areas served by contaminated air conditioning systems.
作者指出在被各种微生物污染的通风系统中工作的员工的发病率。他们分析了96名接触空调系统的工人(A组)和71名呼吸正常环境空气的工人(B组)。两组工人都接受了临床功能和免疫方面的检查。阿杰洛等人使用制备“MMM”抗原(周一早晨不适)作为从系统性真菌病原体生产抗原的原始方法,随后进行了改进。本研究的目的是评估在临床实践中使用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)诊断呼吸道过敏,特别是过敏性肺炎的可能性。通过对常见空气传播过敏原(包括粉尘螨、豚草、草类和烟曲霉)进行皮肤点刺试验、使用酶免疫诊断法——免疫球蛋白E(德国马尔堡贝林werke公司)以及通过放射变应原吸附试验技术(瑞典乌普萨拉法玛西亚公司)测定特异性免疫球蛋白E来确定特应性状态。皮肤点刺试验使用“MMM”抗原进行。使用赖特峰值流量计测量呼气峰值流速(PEFR)。在周一(工作第一天)和周五(工作周结束时)记录PEFR。两组员工周一至周五的PEFR测量值通过威尔科克森检验进行分析。
获取了空调通风口刮屑的培养物,加湿器系统的水也进行了培养。培养出了:普通嗜热放线菌、烟曲霉、普通高温放线菌等。A组和B组员工的问卷结果、临床评估和诊断程序如下:A组38名工人有“周一病”的阳性临床病史。在有症状的A组中,我们发现8例胸部X线片异常。此外,通过肺量计或一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)测量,针对MMM的抗体(ELISA)的存在与肺功能异常之间没有相关性。此外,我们发现ELISA与抗原MMM的点刺试验结果之间有良好的一致性。威尔科克森检验显示两组之间存在统计学显著差异(0.01)。A组PEFR降低的中位数或中心值为10.23%,B组为1.49%。A组5.21%的受试者观察到PEFR降低30%。接触被嗜热放线菌污染的通风系统可能是空调系统中工作的员工发病率增加和工作效率降低的原因。特别是主过滤器应定期检查。此外,对受污染空调系统服务区域的空气中的灰尘和水进行定期微生物检查,可预防员工患慢性阻塞性肺病。