Zaric Bojan, Canak Vukasin, Stojanovic Goran, Jovelic Aleksandra, Sarcev Tatjana, Kuruc Vesna, Eri Zivka, Panjkovic Milana, Milovancev Aleksandar
Institute for Pulmonary Diseases of Vojvodina, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Feb;8(1):79-84. doi: 10.1177/153303460900800110.
The major objective of our study was to determine the specificity and sensitivity of AFI videobronchoscopy vs. white light videobronchoscopy, in the assessment of lung cancer extent. Secondary objective was to investigate whether or not AFI can reveal greater extension of the tumor, and can it influence therapy making decision. Autofluorescence videobronchoscopy systems are new technology for visualization of bronchial mucosa, and the proper indications for such systems will be determined in the near future. In this prospective trial we have enrolled 27 patients with suspected lung cancer in whom we performed 108 diagnostic biopsies and 54 control biopsies. All patients underwent WL videobronchoscopy followed by Auto Fluorescence Imaging (AFI) examination of tracheobronchial tree. We were using videobronchoscope BF-F260 and EVIS LUCERA SPECTRUM processor unit. Overall specificity for AFI in the diagnostics of lung cancer was found to be 85%, sensitivity was 90%, positive predictive value (PPV) 78%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 94%. Specificity, sensitivity, PPV, and NPV for WL videobronchoscopy in lung cancer diagnostics were 54%, 64%, 51%, and 69%, respectively. Relative sensitivity ratio of AFI over WL videobronchoscopy, which is calculated to be 1.41, confirmed superiority of AFI in lung cancer diagnostics. We confirmed significant correlation between the greater extension of the tumor (assessed with AFI) and the therapeutical decision in lung cancer treatment (p = 0.01). Influence of AFI on therapeutical decision was significant (p = 0.034). AFI videobronchoscopy system yields significantly higher sensitivity and specificity for the assessment of lung cancer extent than WLB videobronchoscopy alone. It had shown to be able to influence therapeutic option for lung cancer treatment. Further studies are needed to evaluate and validate these results.
我们研究的主要目的是确定在评估肺癌范围方面,AFI视频支气管镜检查与白光视频支气管镜检查的特异性和敏感性。次要目的是研究AFI是否能揭示肿瘤的更大范围,以及它是否会影响治疗决策。自体荧光视频支气管镜系统是用于可视化支气管黏膜的新技术,此类系统的合适适应证将在不久的将来确定。在这项前瞻性试验中,我们纳入了27例疑似肺癌患者,对其进行了108次诊断性活检和54次对照活检。所有患者均先接受白光视频支气管镜检查,随后对气管支气管树进行自体荧光成像(AFI)检查。我们使用的是BF-F260视频支气管镜和EVIS LUCERA SPECTRUM处理器单元。AFI在肺癌诊断中的总体特异性为85%,敏感性为90%,阳性预测值(PPV)为78%,阴性预测值(NPV)为94%。白光视频支气管镜检查在肺癌诊断中的特异性、敏感性、PPV和NPV分别为54%、64%、51%和69%。计算得出AFI相对于白光视频支气管镜检查的相对敏感性比值为1.41,证实了AFI在肺癌诊断中的优越性。我们证实肿瘤更大范围(通过AFI评估)与肺癌治疗中的治疗决策之间存在显著相关性(p = 0.01)。AFI对治疗决策的影响具有显著性(p = 0.034)。与单独的白光支气管镜检查相比,AFI视频支气管镜系统在评估肺癌范围方面具有显著更高的敏感性和特异性。它已被证明能够影响肺癌治疗的选择。需要进一步的研究来评估和验证这些结果。