Zhang Jianrong, Wu Jieyu, Yang Yujing, Liao Hua, Xu Zhiheng, Hamblin Lindsey Tristine, Jiang Long, Depypere Lieven, Ang Keng Leong, He Jiaxi, Liang Ziyan, Huang Jun, Li Jingpei, He Qihua, Liang Wenhua, He Jianxing
Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China;; China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; National Clinical Research Centre of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; Graduate School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Graduate School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China;; Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Nov;8(11):3205-3216. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.11.61.
We aimed to summarize the diagnostic accuracy of white light bronchoscopy (WLB) and advanced techniques for airway pre-cancerous lesions and early cancer, such as autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB), AFB combined with WLB (AFB + WLB) and narrow-band imaging (NBI) bronchoscopy.
We searched for eligible studies in seven electronic databases from their date of inception to Mar 20, 2015. In eligible studies, detected lesions should be confirmed by histopathology. We extracted and calculated the 2×2 data based on the pathological criteria of lung tumor, including high-grade lesions from moderate dysplasia (MOD) to invasive carcinoma (INV). Random-effect model was used to pool sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).
In 53 eligible studies (39 WLB, 39 AFB, 17 AFB + WLB, 6 NBI), diagnostic performance for high-grade lesions was analyzed based on twelve studies (10 WLB, 7 AFB, 7 AFB + WLB, 1 NBI), involving with totally 2,880 patients and 8,830 biopsy specimens. The sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC of WLB were 51% (95% CI, 34-68%), 86% (95% CI, 73-84%), 6 (95% CI, 3-13) and 77% (95% CI, 73-81%). Those of AFB and AFB + WLB were 93% (95% CI, 77-98%) and 86% (95% CI, 75-97%), 52% (95% CI, 37-67%) and 71% (95% CI, 56-87%), 15 (95% CI, 4-57) and 16 (95% CI, 6-41), and 76% (95% CI, 72-79%) and 82% (95% CI, 78-85%), respectively. NBI presented 100% sensitivity and 43% specificity.
With higher sensitivity, advanced bronchoscopy could be valuable to avoid missed diagnosis. Combining strategy of AFB and WLB may contribute preferable diagnosis rather than their alone use for high-grade lesions. Studies of NBI warrants further investigation for precancerous lesions.
我们旨在总结白光支气管镜检查(WLB)以及气道癌前病变和早期癌症的先进技术,如自发荧光支气管镜检查(AFB)、AFB联合WLB(AFB + WLB)和窄带成像(NBI)支气管镜检查的诊断准确性。
我们在七个电子数据库中检索了从其创建日期到2015年3月20日的符合条件的研究。在符合条件的研究中,检测到的病变应通过组织病理学确诊。我们根据肺肿瘤的病理标准提取并计算2×2数据,包括从中度发育异常(MOD)到浸润癌(INV)的高级别病变。采用随机效应模型汇总敏感性、特异性、诊断比值比(DOR)和受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。
在53项符合条件的研究(39项WLB、39项AFB、17项AFB + WLB、6项NBI)中,基于12项研究(10项WLB、7项AFB、7项AFB + WLB、1项NBI)分析了高级别病变的诊断性能,共涉及2880例患者和8830份活检标本。WLB的敏感性、特异性、DOR和AUC分别为51%(95%CI,34 - 68%)、86%(95%CI,73 - 84%)、6(95%CI,3 - 13)和77%(95%CI,73 - 81%)。AFB和AFB + WLB的相应数据分别为93%(95%CI,77 - 98%)和86%(95%CI,75 - 97%)、52%(95%CI,37 - 67%)和71%(95%CI,56 - 87%)、15(95%CI,4 - 57)和16(95%CI,6 - 41),以及76%(95%CI,72 - 79%)和82%(95%CI,78 - 85%)。NBI的敏感性为100%,特异性为43%。
先进的支气管镜检查具有较高的敏感性,对于避免漏诊可能具有重要价值。AFB和WLB联合策略对于高级别病变可能比单独使用更有助于诊断。NBI在癌前病变方面的研究值得进一步探讨。