• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钇稳定氧化锆牙科种植体基台的抗断裂性

Fracture resistance of yttria-stabilized zirconia dental implant abutments.

作者信息

Adatia Nimet D, Bayne Stephen C, Cooper Lyndon F, Thompson Jeffery Y

机构信息

University of North Carolina School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2009 Jan;18(1):17-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00378.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00378.x
PMID:19166544
Abstract

PURPOSE

An in vitro study was performed to assess the effect of different degrees of clinical reduction of zirconia abutments on the failure load of clinical assemblies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Zirconia abutments (Y-TZP Ceramic Abutment, Astra Tech) were prepared with 0, 0.5, or 1 mm of external axial reduction starting 1 mm above the height-of-contour. Abutments (n = 10) were attached to implant analogs (25 Ncm torque) embedded in a stainless steel cylinder using Field's metal. Fracture loads (N) were determined when assemblies were loaded at 60 degrees off-axis until failure (Instron, CHS = 0.1 mm/min). Groups were statistically compared using ANOVA (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Fracture loads for all assemblies displayed large variations within groups. There were no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) among different abutment groups with a mean fracture load of 429 N (+/-140) for the control group, 576 N (+/-120) for 0.5-mm margins, and 547 (+/-139) for 1.0-mm margins. All fractures occurred at the interface where the abutment was connected to the analog.

CONCLUSION

In this in vitro study of simulated ultimate assembly strength, the preparation of zirconia abutments did not significantly impair the fracture resistance of simulated implant assemblies. All implant abutments fractured at rates higher than the maximum incisal forces (90-370 N) estimated to occur in the anterior region of the mouth.

摘要

目的

进行一项体外研究,以评估氧化锆基台不同程度的临床就位对临床组件破坏载荷的影响。

材料与方法

制备氧化锆基台(Y-TZP陶瓷基台,Astra Tech),从外形高点上方1mm处开始进行0、0.5或1mm的外部轴向就位。使用菲尔德合金将基台(n = 10)连接到嵌入不锈钢圆柱体中的种植体代型上(扭矩为25 Ncm)。当组件以离轴60度加载直至破坏时测定破坏载荷(N)(Instron,CHS = 0.1 mm/min)。使用方差分析对各组进行统计学比较(p < 0.05)。

结果

所有组件的破坏载荷在组内显示出很大差异。不同基台组之间无统计学显著差异(p > 0.05),对照组的平均破坏载荷为429 N(±140),0.5mm边缘组为576 N(±120),1.0mm边缘组为547(±139)。所有骨折均发生在基台与代型连接的界面处。

结论

在这项模拟最终组件强度的体外研究中,氧化锆基台的制备并未显著损害模拟种植体组件的抗断裂性。所有种植体基台的断裂发生率均高于估计在口腔前部区域出现的最大切牙力(90 - 370 N)。

相似文献

1
Fracture resistance of yttria-stabilized zirconia dental implant abutments.钇稳定氧化锆牙科种植体基台的抗断裂性
J Prosthodont. 2009 Jan;18(1):17-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00378.x.
2
Fracture load of different crown systems on zirconia implant abutments.不同冠系统在氧化锆种植体基台上的 fracture load。
Dent Mater. 2011 Mar;27(3):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
3
Stability of prototype two-piece zirconia and titanium implants after artificial aging: an in vitro pilot study.两种型号的氧化锆和钛种植体原型在人工老化后的稳定性:一项体外初步研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Dec;11(4):323-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00116.x. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
4
Reliability and fatigue damage modes of zirconia and titanium abutments.氧化锆和钛基台的可靠性和疲劳损伤模式。
Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Jan-Feb;23(1):56-9.
5
Load-bearing capacity of custom-made versus prefabricated commercially available zirconia abutments.定制与预制商业可用氧化锆基台的承载能力。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(1):132-8.
6
Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.可压制金属陶瓷定制种植体基台与CAD/CAM商业制造的氧化锆种植体基台的抗折性比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Apr;101(4):226-30. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60043-3.
7
Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.种植体-陶瓷基台组合的负载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):636-46.
8
Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.使用钛基与定制氧化锆种植体基台的牙-牙和种植体-牙支持的全瓷固定局部义齿的断裂力
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Oct;19(10):1049-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01551.x.
9
Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.锆及金属种植体基台的抗折性与失效位置
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Nov 1;9(7):41-8.
10
A comparison of fabrication precision and mechanical reliability of 2 zirconia implant abutments.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(6):1029-36.

引用本文的文献

1
The mechanical complications and behavior of angulated dental implant abutment systems versus conventional abutments, a narrative review.角度式牙种植体基台系统与传统基台的机械并发症及性能:一篇叙述性综述
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Aug;36(8):1072-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
2
Comparison of fracture strength in implant supported zirconia-titanium base abutments.种植体支持的氧化锆-钛基台断裂强度的比较
Bioinformation. 2024 Jun 30;20(6):665-668. doi: 10.6026/973206300200665. eCollection 2024.
3
Effects of screw channel angulation on the fracture resistance of one-piece zirconia crown with titanium base.
螺钉通道角度对钛基一体式氧化锆全冠抗折性能的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2025 Feb;34(2):167-173. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13806. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
High-Translucency Zirconia Following Chemical Vapor Deposition with SiH4: Evidence of Surface Modifications and Improved Bonding.用 SiH4 进行化学气相沉积后的高透明度氧化锆:表面改性及粘结改善的证据
J Adhes Dent. 2023 Jan 12;25:1-12. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b3801051.
5
Comparing the Fracture Resistance and Modes of Failure in Different Types of CAD/CAM Zirconia Abutments with Internal Hexagonal Implants: An In Vitro Study.不同类型带内六角种植体的CAD/CAM氧化锆基台的抗折性及失效模式比较:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 4;15(7):2656. doi: 10.3390/ma15072656.
6
Titanium Base Abutments in Implant Prosthodontics: A Literature Review.种植修复学中的钛基台:文献综述
Eur J Dent. 2022 Feb;16(1):49-55. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735423. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
7
Shear Bond Strength of Zirconia Ceramic to Four Different Core Materials, An Study.氧化锆陶瓷与四种不同核材料的剪切粘结强度研究
J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Jun;22(2):138-143. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.86215.1176.
8
In Vitro Comparison of Modes of Failures among Titanium and One- and Two-piece Zirconia Abutment under Static Load.静态载荷下钛基台与一体式及两件式氧化锆基台失效模式的体外比较
Eur J Dent. 2020 Feb;14(1):157-160. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702260. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
9
[Expert consensus on biomechanical research of dental implant].[牙种植体生物力学研究专家共识]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 1;37(2):115-123. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2019.02.001.
10
Influence of implant location on the clinical outcomes of implant abutments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体位置对种植体基台临床结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018 Feb 26;10:19-35. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S143910. eCollection 2018.