Suppr超能文献

静态载荷下钛基台与一体式及两件式氧化锆基台失效模式的体外比较

In Vitro Comparison of Modes of Failures among Titanium and One- and Two-piece Zirconia Abutment under Static Load.

作者信息

Alqahtani Fawaz, AlAmar Mohammed

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi-Arabia.

Department of Prosthodontics, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Eur J Dent. 2020 Feb;14(1):157-160. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702260. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to assess modes of failures under static load (SL) among titanium (Ti) and one- and two-piece zirconia abutment (ZA) .

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Ti abutments were digitally scanned for the fabrication of the one- and two-piece zirconia abutment specimens. This was done to standardize the design of the one-piece abutment and make it the blueprint of the Ti abutment. Twenty-one implant abutments and 21 implant replicas were categorized into three groups as follows: group 1 (Titanium group), group 2 (one-piece ZA group), and group 3 (two-piece ZA group). A 250K-cycle, linear fatigue-load, reaching 10 to 210 Newton (N), was put on all specimens using an all-electric dynamic test instrument and the specimens were loaded until fracture.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Assessment of mode of fracture among the groups was done visually. Significance was based below 0.05.

RESULTS

Screw fracture ( = 7) and abutment bending at the apical part ( = 7) occurred in the Ti group. In the one-piece zirconia group, screw and abutment fractures occurred in seven and seven cases, respectively. In the two-piece zirconia group, screw fracture ( = 7) above the Ti zirconia junction (transgingival segment) and abutment fracture ( = 7) were determined as the failure modes.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, all abutments underwent failures under SL ; and the mode of failure modes varied among the different abutment designs used.

摘要

目的

评估钛(Ti)基台以及一体式和两件式氧化锆基台(ZA)在静态载荷(SL)下的失效模式。

材料与方法

对钛基台进行数字扫描,以制作一体式和两件式氧化锆基台标本。这样做是为了规范一体式基台的设计,并使其成为钛基台的蓝图。将21个种植体基台和21个种植体复制体分为以下三组:第1组(钛组)、第2组(一体式ZA组)和第3组(两件式ZA组)。使用全电动动态测试仪器对所有标本施加25万次循环、线性疲劳载荷,载荷范围为10至210牛顿(N),并对标本加载直至断裂。

统计分析

通过肉眼评估各组之间的骨折模式。显著性基于0.05以下。

结果

钛组发生螺钉骨折(=7)和基台根尖部弯曲(=7)。在一体式氧化锆组中,分别有7例发生螺钉和基台骨折。在两件式氧化锆组中,钛氧化锆交界处(龈上段)上方的螺钉骨折(=7)和基台骨折(=7)被确定为失效模式。

结论

总之,所有基台在静态载荷下均发生失效;并且在所使用的不同基台设计中,失效模式各不相同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/728d/7069741/f2a94407979b/10-1055-s-0040-1702260_00358_01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验