Suppr超能文献

角度式牙种植体基台系统与传统基台的机械并发症及性能:一篇叙述性综述

The mechanical complications and behavior of angulated dental implant abutment systems versus conventional abutments, a narrative review.

作者信息

Albakri Ahmed

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Saudi Dent J. 2024 Aug;36(8):1072-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Angulated screw channel (ASC) abutment allows off-axis dental implants to be used in dental restorations without the need for cementation. As this is a relatively new system, research on its clinical performance is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the available in-vitro and in-vivo studies on the mechanical and technical issues associated with the ASC system and compare its clinical performance with that of conventional implant-supported abutments.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect databases was performed, focusing on articles about angulated (angled) screw channel (ASC) systems published in English between January 2015 and November 2023. Only in-vitro and in-vivo studies were included.

RESULTS

After analyzing the recorded articles, 26 studies (11 in vivo and 15 in vitro) were included in the final discussion and review.

CONCLUSION

Although the ASC system is still relatively new, and is presently outperformed by conventional abutment systems in terms of technical and mechanical properties, in short- and medium-term in-vivo studies, it was shown reliable for retaining single or multiple-unit implant restorations in both posterior and anterior zones. Still, further long-term clinical research is needed to fully elucidate the risk factors associated with ASC failures.

摘要

背景

成角螺钉通道(ASC)基台允许在牙修复中使用非轴向牙种植体,而无需粘结。由于这是一个相对较新的系统,对其临床性能的研究有限。

目的

总结关于ASC系统相关机械和技术问题的现有体外和体内研究,并将其临床性能与传统种植体支持基台的临床性能进行比较。

方法

在PubMed、科学网和ScienceDirect数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,重点关注2015年1月至2023年11月期间以英文发表的关于成角(angled)螺钉通道(ASC)系统的文章。仅纳入体外和体内研究。

结果

在分析记录的文章后,26项研究(11项体内研究和15项体外研究)被纳入最终讨论和综述。

结论

尽管ASC系统仍然相对较新,并且目前在技术和机械性能方面不如传统基台系统,但在短期和中期体内研究中,它被证明在保留后牙区和前牙区的单单位或多单位种植体修复方面是可靠的。不过,仍需要进一步的长期临床研究来充分阐明与ASC失败相关的风险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0de/11337959/f7de251175b8/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验