Bauss Oskar, Freitag Stefan, Röhling Johannes, Rahman Alexander
Faculty of Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
J Orofac Orthop. 2008 Nov;69(6):402-10. doi: 10.1007/s00056-008-8805-1. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
The aim of this study was to assess the influence of overjet size and lip coverage on the prevalence and severity of incisor trauma.
Dental records made on presentation of 1,367 patients were examined for data concerning the prevalence, type and severity of incisor trauma. Original overjet was measured on the pre-treatment study models and divided into two categories: normal overjet (0-3.0 mm) and increased overjet (> 3.0 mm). Lip coverage of the upper incisors was estimated with reference to photographs showing the patient's face and was then rated as adequate or inadequate. The patients were then divided into three groups: normal original overjet and adequate lip coverage (Group 1), increased original overjet and adequate lip coverage (Group 2), and increased original overjet and inadequate lip coverage (Group 3).
Group 1 patients revealed a significantly lower prevalence of traumatic injuries than those in Group 2 (p = 0.028) or Group 3 (p = 0.003), and the odds ratios compared to Group 1 were 1.6634 for Group 2 and 2.0336 for Group 3. Regarding the type of trauma, Group 3 patients showed a significantly higher frequency of periodontal injuries than those in Group 1 (p = 0.018) or Group 2 (p = 0.015). Furthermore, Group 3 patients had significantly more in juries to two or more teeth per person than patients in Group 1 (p < 0.001) or Group 2 (p < 0.001).
Increased overjet and inadequate lip coverage increase the risk and severity of incisor trauma. Early orthodontic treatment might prevent dental trauma in these patients.
本研究旨在评估覆盖超牙合大小和唇部覆盖情况对切牙外伤患病率及严重程度的影响。
检查了1367例患者就诊时的牙科记录,以获取有关切牙外伤患病率、类型和严重程度的数据。在治疗前的研究模型上测量原始覆盖超牙合,并将其分为两类:正常覆盖超牙合(0 - 3.0毫米)和增加的覆盖超牙合(> 3.0毫米)。参照显示患者面部的照片估计上切牙的唇部覆盖情况,然后将其评定为充足或不足。然后将患者分为三组:正常原始覆盖超牙合且唇部覆盖充足(第1组)、增加的原始覆盖超牙合且唇部覆盖充足(第2组)以及增加的原始覆盖超牙合且唇部覆盖不足(第3组)。
第1组患者的外伤患病率显著低于第2组(p = 0.028)或第3组(p = 0.003),与第1组相比,第2组的优势比为1.6634,第3组为2.0336。关于外伤类型,第3组患者的牙周损伤频率显著高于第1组(p = 0.018)或第2组(p = 0.015)。此外,第3组患者每人两颗或更多颗牙齿受伤的情况显著多于第1组(p < 0.001)或第2组(p < 0.001)。
覆盖超牙合增加和唇部覆盖不足会增加切牙外伤的风险和严重程度。早期正畸治疗可能预防这些患者的牙外伤。