Mehta M R, Dada V K, Singh A K
Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 1991 Apr-Jun;39(2):53-4.
A prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out to compare the intercapsular or the endocapsular technique of IOL insertion and conventional posterior chamber IOL insertion after can opener capsulotomy. Age and sex matched groups of 76 patients each underwent surgery by the two techniques. The corneal and the uveal reaction was evaluated on the first day after the surgery and specular counts were done at six weeks. Though the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant, a trend in favour of intercapsular technique emerged strongly.
进行了一项前瞻性随机临床试验,以比较开罐式截囊术后囊内或囊内植入人工晶状体(IOL)技术与传统后房型IOL植入术。年龄和性别匹配的两组患者,每组76例,分别接受这两种技术的手术。在术后第一天评估角膜和葡萄膜反应,并在六周时进行内皮细胞计数。尽管两组之间的差异无统计学意义,但强烈出现了有利于囊内技术的趋势。