Suppr超能文献

为什么选择囊内治疗?

Why go endocapsular?

作者信息

Mehta M R, Dada V K, Singh A K

机构信息

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 1991 Apr-Jun;39(2):53-4.

PMID:1916980
Abstract

A prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out to compare the intercapsular or the endocapsular technique of IOL insertion and conventional posterior chamber IOL insertion after can opener capsulotomy. Age and sex matched groups of 76 patients each underwent surgery by the two techniques. The corneal and the uveal reaction was evaluated on the first day after the surgery and specular counts were done at six weeks. Though the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant, a trend in favour of intercapsular technique emerged strongly.

摘要

进行了一项前瞻性随机临床试验,以比较开罐式截囊术后囊内或囊内植入人工晶状体(IOL)技术与传统后房型IOL植入术。年龄和性别匹配的两组患者,每组76例,分别接受这两种技术的手术。在术后第一天评估角膜和葡萄膜反应,并在六周时进行内皮细胞计数。尽管两组之间的差异无统计学意义,但强烈出现了有利于囊内技术的趋势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验