Shah A R, Praveen M R, Vasavada A R
Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic, Memnagar, Ahmedabad, India.
Eye (Lond). 2008 Jul;22(7):889-94. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702747. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
To compare the performance of single-piece acrylic vspoly (methylmethacrylate) intraocular lenses (IOL) on the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after conventional extra capsular cataract extraction (ECCE).
One hundred and eighty-two eyes of 91 patients with bilateral senile cataract undergoing ECCE were prospectively randomized to receive a single-piece Alcon AcrySof SA60AT IOL or a single-piece EPOCH polymethylmethacrylate IOL in the first eye to have surgery. At 1, 6 and 12 months post-operative follow-up, digital retro illumination images of the posterior capsule were taken for PCO assessment semi-objectively using PCO (POCO automated analysis software) system. Relationship of anterior capsule contact (total off and partial cover) on optic for PCO was analyzed.
The AcrySof IOL was associated with less PCO than EPOCH lens at 6 months (10.01+/-8.75% vs 32.26+/-27.44%; P<0.001) and 1-year (11.65+/-10.55% vs 38.38+/-29.62%; P<0.001) follow-up. The EPOCH IOL showed a remarkably significant difference on development of PCO with anterior capsule overlap on IOL optic (total off and part on) 1 year (P<0.039), whereas no such difference was observed with the AcrySof IOL (P=0.197).
The AcrySof IOL led to significantly less PCO than the EPOCH IOL post-operatively after extracapsular cataract extraction.
比较单片丙烯酸酯与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯人工晶状体(IOL)在常规囊外白内障摘除术(ECCE)后后囊膜混浊(PCO)发生情况方面的性能。
91例双侧老年性白内障患者的182只眼睛接受ECCE,前瞻性随机分为在第一只接受手术的眼中植入单片爱尔康AcrySof SA60AT IOL或单片EPOCH聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯IOL。在术后1、6和12个月随访时,使用PCO(POCO自动分析软件)系统对后囊膜进行数字后照照明成像,以半客观方式评估PCO。分析了人工晶状体光学部前囊膜接触(完全脱离和部分覆盖)与PCO的关系。
在6个月(10.01±8.75%对32.26±27.44%;P<0.001)和1年(11.65±10.55%对38.38±29.62%;P<0.001)随访时,AcrySof IOL的PCO发生率低于EPOCH晶状体。EPOCH IOL在人工晶状体光学部前囊膜重叠(完全脱离和部分接触)1年时PCO的发生有显著差异(P<0.039),而AcrySof IOL未观察到此类差异(P=0.197)。
囊外白内障摘除术后,AcrySof IOL导致的PCO明显少于EPOCH IOL。