Suppr超能文献

电子处方质量评估:在三家邮购药店进行的一项观察性研究。

Assessment of ePrescription quality: an observational study at three mail-order pharmacies.

作者信息

Astrand Bengt, Montelius Emelie, Petersson Göran, Ekedahl Anders

机构信息

Apoteket AB, and School of Pure and Applied Natural Sciences, University of Kalmar, Kalmar, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Jan 26;9:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The introduction of electronic transfer of prescriptions (ETP) or ePrescriptions in ambulatory health care has been suggested to have a positive impact on the prescribing and dispensing processes. Thereby, implying that ePrescribing can improve safety, quality, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. In December 2007, 68% of all new prescriptions were transferred electronically in Sweden. The aim of the present study was to assess the quality of ePrescriptions by comparing the proportions of ePrescriptions and non-electronic prescriptions necessitating a clarification contact (correction, completion or change) with the prescriber at the time of dispensing.

METHODS

A direct observational study was performed at three Swedish mail-order pharmacies which were known to dispense a large proportion of ePrescriptions (38-75%). Data were gathered on all ePrescriptions dispensed at these pharmacies over a three week period in February 2006. All clarification contacts with prescribers were included in the study and were classified and assessed in comparison with all drug prescriptions dispensed at the same pharmacies over the specified period.

RESULTS

Of the 31225 prescriptions dispensed during the study period, clarification contacts were made for 2.0% (147/7532) of new ePrescriptions and 1.2% (79/6833) of new non-electronic prescriptions. This represented a relative risk (RR) of 1.7 (95% CI 1.3-2.2) for new ePrescriptions compared to new non-electronic prescriptions. The increased RR was mainly due to 'Dosage and directions for use', which had an RR of 7.6 (95% CI 2.8-20.4) when compared to other clarification contacts. In all, 89.5% of the suggested pharmacist interventions were accepted by the prescriber, 77.7% (192/247) as suggested and an additional 11.7% (29/247) after a modification during contact with the prescriber.

CONCLUSION

The increased proportion of prescriptions necessitating a clarification contact for new ePrescriptions compared to new non-electronic prescriptions indicates the need for an increased focus on quality aspects in ePrescribing deployment. ETP technology should be developed towards a two-way communication between the prescriber and the pharmacist with automated checks of missing, inaccurate, or ambiguous information. This would enhance safety and quality for the patient and also improve efficiency and cost-effectiveness within the health care system.

摘要

背景

在门诊医疗中引入电子处方传递(ETP)或电子处方被认为对处方开具和配药流程有积极影响。由此暗示电子处方开具可以提高安全性、质量、效率和成本效益。2007年12月,瑞典68%的新处方通过电子方式传递。本研究的目的是通过比较配药时需要与开处方者进行澄清联系(更正、补充或更改)的电子处方和非电子处方的比例,来评估电子处方的质量。

方法

在瑞典三家以大量配给电子处方(38 - 75%)而闻名的邮购药店进行了一项直接观察性研究。收集了2006年2月为期三周内在这些药店配给的所有电子处方的数据。与开处方者的所有澄清联系都纳入了研究,并与同一药店在指定期间配给的所有药品处方进行分类和评估。

结果

在研究期间配给的31225张处方中,新电子处方中有2.0%(147/7532)需要进行澄清联系,新非电子处方中有1.2%(79/6833)需要进行澄清联系。与新非电子处方相比,新电子处方的相对风险(RR)为1.7(95%置信区间1.3 - 2.2)。RR增加主要是由于“剂量和使用说明”,与其他澄清联系相比,其RR为7.6(95%置信区间2.8 - 20.4)。总体而言,89.5%的药师建议干预措施被开处方者接受,77.7%(192/247)按建议接受,另有11.7%(29/247)在与开处方者联系期间修改后接受。

结论

与新非电子处方相比,新电子处方中需要进行澄清联系的处方比例增加,表明在电子处方开具应用中需要更加关注质量方面。ETP技术应朝着开处方者和药师之间的双向通信发展,并自动检查缺失、不准确或模糊的信息。这将提高患者的安全性和质量,同时也提高医疗保健系统内的效率和成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fb0/2654447/ff73153fdd82/1472-6947-9-8-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验