Soda Paolo, Iannello Giulio
Facoltà di Ingegneria, Università CampusBio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21-00128 Rome, Italy.
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2009 May;13(3):322-9. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2008.2010855. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
Indirect immunofluorescence is currently the recommended method for the detection of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANA). The diagnosis consists of both estimating the fluorescence intensity and reporting the staining pattern for positive wells only. Since resources and adequately trained personnel are not always available for these tasks, an evident medical demand is the development of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) tools that can support the physician decisions. In this paper, we present a system that classifies the staining pattern of positive wells on the strength of the recognition of their cells. The core of the CAD is a multiple expert system (MES) based on the one-per-class approach devised to label the pattern of single cells. It employs a hybrid approach since each composing binary module is constituted by an ensemble of classifiers combined by a fusion rule. Each expert uses a set of stable and effective features selected from a wide pool of statistical and spectral measurements. In this framework, we present a novel parameter that measures the reliability of the final classification provided by the MES. This feature is used to introduce a reject option that allows to reduce the error rate in the recognition of the staining pattern of the whole well. The approach has been evaluated on 37 wells, for a total of 573 cells. The measured performance shows a low overall error rate ( 2.7%-5.8%), which is below the observed intralaboratory variability.
间接免疫荧光法目前是检测抗核自身抗体(ANA)的推荐方法。诊断包括估计荧光强度并仅报告阳性孔的染色模式。由于并非总能获得用于这些任务的资源和训练有素的人员,因此明显的医疗需求是开发能够支持医生决策的计算机辅助诊断(CAD)工具。在本文中,我们提出了一种系统,该系统根据对阳性孔中细胞的识别来对其染色模式进行分类。CAD的核心是一个基于单类方法设计的多专家系统(MES),用于标记单个细胞的模式。它采用混合方法,因为每个组成的二元模块由通过融合规则组合的分类器集合构成。每个专家使用从大量统计和光谱测量中选择的一组稳定且有效的特征。在此框架下,我们提出了一个新参数,用于衡量MES提供的最终分类的可靠性。此特征用于引入一个拒绝选项,该选项可降低识别整个孔的染色模式时的错误率。该方法已在37个孔上进行了评估,共计573个细胞。测量结果显示总体错误率较低(2.7%-5.8%),低于观察到的实验室内变异性。