Curiale M S, Sons T, McIver D, McAllister J S, Halsey B, Roblee D, Fox T L
Silliker Laboratories, Inc., Chicago Heights, IL 60411.
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1991 Jul-Aug;74(4):635-48.
Rehydratable dry-film plating methods for total coliforms and Escherichia coli in foods have been compared to the AOAC most probable number methods. Fourteen laboratories participated in the collaborative study. Three coliform and E. coli levels in 6 samples of 4 product types (flour, nuts, cheese, and beef with gravy) and in 3 samples of 2 product types (mushrooms and raw turkey) were tested in duplicate by the participants. The mean log counts for the 3 methods were comparable. In general, the repeatability and reproducibility variances of the plating methods were as good as or better than that of the MPN method. The method has been adopted official first action by AOAC.
已将用于食品中总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的可再水化干膜平板计数法与美国官方分析化学家协会(AOAC)的最大可能数法进行了比较。14个实验室参与了这项协作研究。参与者对4种产品类型(面粉、坚果、奶酪和带肉汁牛肉)的6个样本以及2种产品类型(蘑菇和生火鸡)的3个样本中的三种大肠菌群和大肠杆菌水平进行了双份检测。这三种方法的平均对数计数具有可比性。一般来说,平板计数法的重复性和再现性方差与MPN法相当或更好。该方法已被AOAC采用为官方首次行动方法。