Ginn R E, Packard V S, Fox T L
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1986 May-Jun;69(3):527-31.
Eleven laboratories participated in a collaborative study to compare the dry rehydratable film (Petrifilm SM and Petrifilm VRB) methods, respectively, to the standard plate count (SPC) and violet red bile agar (VRBA) standard methods for estimation of total bacteria and coliform counts in raw and homogenized pasteurized milk. Each laboratory analyzed 16 samples (8 different samples in blind duplicate) for total count by both the SPC and Petrifilm SM methods. A second set of 16 samples was analyzed by the VRBA and Petrifilm VRB methods. The repeatability standard deviations (the square root of the between-replicates variance) of the SPC, Petrifilm SM, VRBA, and Petrifilm VRB methods were 0.05104, 0.0444, 0.14606, and 0.13806, respectively; the reproducibility standard deviations were 0.7197, 0.06380, 0.15326, and 0.13806, respectively. The difference between the mean log10 SPC and the mean log10 Petrifilm SM results was 0.027. For the VRBA and Petrifilm VRB methods, the mean log10 difference was 0.013. These results generally indicate the suitability of the dry rehydratable film methods as alternatives to the SPC and VRBA methods for milk samples. The methods have been adopted official first action.
11个实验室参与了一项合作研究,分别将干可复水薄膜(Petrifilm SM和Petrifilm VRB)方法与标准平板计数法(SPC)和紫红胆盐琼脂(VRBA)标准方法进行比较,以估计生牛奶和匀质巴氏杀菌乳中的总细菌数和大肠菌群数。每个实验室用SPC和Petrifilm SM方法对16个样品(8个不同样品,双份盲样)进行总数分析。另一组16个样品用VRBA和Petrifilm VRB方法进行分析。SPC、Petrifilm SM、VRBA和Petrifilm VRB方法的重复性标准偏差(重复样品间方差的平方根)分别为0.05104、0.0444、0.14606和0.13806;再现性标准偏差分别为0.7197、0.06380、0.15326和0.13806。SPC的平均log10值与Petrifilm SM结果的平均log10值之差为0.027。对于VRBA和Petrifilm VRB方法,平均log10差值为0.013。这些结果总体表明,干可复水薄膜方法适合作为牛奶样品SPC和VRBA方法的替代方法。这些方法已被采用为官方首次行动方法。