Eckert Siegfried, Horstkotte Dieter
Department of Cardiology, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2009;9(1):17-28. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200909010-00003.
Progress in prevention as well as drug and interventional therapy has improved the prognosis of patients with cardiovascular disorders. Many patients at risk have advanced coronary artery disease (CAD), have had multiple coronary interventions, and present with significant co-morbidity. Despite adequate risk factor modulation and often several revascularization procedures, some of these patients still have refractory angina pectoris. Apart from advanced CAD and insufficient collateralization, the cause is often endothelial dysfunction. For this situation, one treatment option is neuromodulation. Controlled studies suggest that, in patients with chronic refractory angina pectoris, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides a relief from symptoms equivalent to that provided by surgical therapy, but with fewer complications and lower rehospitalization rates. SCS may result in significant long-term pain relief with improved quality of life. In patients with refractory angina undergoing SCS, some studies have shown not only a symptomatic improvement, but also a decrease in myocardial ischemia and an increase in coronary blood flow. Discussion is ongoing as to whether this is a direct effect on parasympathetic vascodilation or merely a secondary phenomenon resulting from increased physical activity following an improvement in clinical symptoms. Results from nuclear medical studies have sparked discussion about improved endothelial function and increased collateralization. SCS is a safe treatment option for patients with refractory angina pectoris, and its long-term effects are evident. It is a procedure without significant complications that is easy to tolerate. SCS does not interact with pacemakers, provided that strict bipolar right-ventricular sensing is used. Use in patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillators is under discussion. Individual testing is mandatory in order to assess optimal safety in each patient.
预防以及药物和介入治疗方面的进展改善了心血管疾病患者的预后。许多高危患者患有晚期冠状动脉疾病(CAD),接受过多次冠状动脉介入治疗,且伴有严重的合并症。尽管进行了充分的危险因素调控,且通常进行了多次血运重建手术,但这些患者中仍有一些患有难治性心绞痛。除了晚期CAD和侧支循环不足外,病因通常是内皮功能障碍。对于这种情况,一种治疗选择是神经调节。对照研究表明,在慢性难治性心绞痛患者中,脊髓刺激(SCS)缓解症状的效果与手术治疗相当,但并发症更少,再住院率更低。SCS可能会带来显著的长期疼痛缓解,并改善生活质量。在接受SCS的难治性心绞痛患者中,一些研究不仅显示出症状改善,还显示出心肌缺血减少和冠状动脉血流增加。关于这是对副交感神经血管舒张的直接作用,还是仅仅是临床症状改善后体力活动增加导致的继发现象,仍在进行讨论。核医学研究结果引发了关于内皮功能改善和侧支循环增加的讨论。SCS是难治性心绞痛患者的一种安全治疗选择,其长期效果明显。这是一种并发症少、易于耐受的手术。只要使用严格的双极右心室感知,SCS就不会与起搏器相互作用。植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的使用正在讨论中。为了评估每个患者的最佳安全性,必须进行个体测试。