Buchser Eric, Durrer Anne, Albrecht Eric
Anesthesia and Pain Management Services, Center for Neuromodulation EHC, Hospital of Morges, Morges, Switzerland.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Apr;31(4 Suppl):S36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.12.008.
Despite sophisticated medical and surgical procedures, including percutaneous endovascular methods, a large number of patients suffer from chronic refractory angina pectoris. Improvement of pain relief in this category of patients requires the use of adjuvant therapies, of which spinal cord stimulation (SCS) seems to be the most promising. Controlled studies suggest that in patients with chronic refractory angina, SCS provides symptomatic relief that is equivalent to that provided by surgical or endovascular reperfusion procedures, but with a lower rate of complications and rehospitalization. Similarly, SCS proved cost effective compared to medical as well as surgical or endovascular approaches in a comparable group of patients. This technique is still met with reluctance by the medical community. Reasons for this disinclination may be related to incomplete understanding of the mechanism of action of SCS and the fact that SCS refers to the modulation of neuroendocrine parameters rather than to revascularization, which is currently the dominant treatment paradigm in coronary artery disease.
尽管有包括经皮血管内方法在内的复杂医疗和外科手术,但仍有大量患者患有慢性顽固性心绞痛。改善这类患者的疼痛缓解需要使用辅助疗法,其中脊髓刺激(SCS)似乎是最有前景的。对照研究表明,在慢性顽固性心绞痛患者中,SCS提供的症状缓解与手术或血管内再灌注程序相当,但并发症和再住院率较低。同样,在一组类似患者中,与药物治疗以及手术或血管内治疗方法相比,SCS被证明具有成本效益。然而,该技术仍不为医学界所接受。这种不情愿的原因可能与对SCS作用机制的不完全理解以及SCS涉及神经内分泌参数的调节而非血管重建这一事实有关,而血管重建目前是冠状动脉疾病的主要治疗模式。